-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow to run only a few GUI tests #86293
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GuillaumeGomez
added
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
A-doctests
Area: Documentation tests, run by rustdoc
T-rustdoc
labels
Jun 14, 2021
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 14, 2021
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 6a66b79 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 16, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#85283 (Avoid possible filename collision in coverage tests) - rust-lang#86200 (Updates `Clone` docs for `Copy` comparison.) - rust-lang#86209 (fix minor wording/typo issues in core::option docs) - rust-lang#86242 (rustdoc- dont ICE on `ConstEvaluatable` predicates) - rust-lang#86280 (Add a regression test for issue-76510) - rust-lang#86293 (Allow to run only a few GUI tests) - rust-lang#86327 (Don't mark "safe" intrinsics as unsafe) - rust-lang#86345 (Remove some duplicate `char` assoc items on RELEASES.md) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2021
…Mark-Simulacrum Allow to pass arguments to rustdoc-gui tool Very convenient for testing. This is another part of rust-lang#86293 cc `@jsha` r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2021
…Mark-Simulacrum Allow to pass arguments to rustdoc-gui tool Very convenient for testing. This is another part of rust-lang#86293 cc ``@jsha`` r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
jyn514
added
the
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Jun 22, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-doctests
Area: Documentation tests, run by rustdoc
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It allows to specify only one (or more) GUI tests. Considering the tests are not super fast to run, this is very useful for development.
cc @Mark-Simulacrum
r? @jsha