Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #86806

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jul 2, 2021
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

iwahbe and others added 13 commits June 29, 2021 15:24
The recursion_limit attribute avoids the following error:

```
error[E0275]: overflow evaluating the requirement `std::ptr::Unique<rustc_ast::Pat>: std::marker::Send`
  |
  = help: consider adding a `#![recursion_limit="256"]` attribute to your crate (`rustfmt_nightly`)
```
…crate-load, r=jyn514

Revert "Don't load all extern crates unconditionally"

Fixes rust-lang#84738.

This reverts rust-lang#83738.

For the "smart" load of external crates, we need to be able to access their items in order to check their doc comments, which seems, if not impossible, quite complicated using only the AST.

For some context, I first tried to extend the `IntraLinkCrateLoader` visitor by adding `visit_foreign_item`. Unfortunately, it never enters into this call, so definitely not the right place...

I then added `visit_use_tree` to then check all the imports outside with something like this:

```rust
let mut loader = crate::passes::collect_intra_doc_links::IntraLinkCrateLoader::new(resolver);
    ast::visit::walk_crate(&mut loader, krate);

    let mut items = Vec::new();
    for import in &loader.imports_to_check {
        if let Some(item) = krate.items.iter().find(|i| i.id == *import) {
            items.push(item);
        }
    }
    for item in items {
        ast::visit::walk_item(&mut item);
        for attr in &item.attrs {
            loader.check_attribute(attr);
        }
    }
```

This was, of course, a failure. We find the items without problems, but we still can't go into the external crate to check its items' attributes.

Finally, `@jyn514` suggested to look into the [`CrateLoader`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_metadata/creader/struct.CrateLoader.html), but it only seems to provide metadata (I went through [`CStore`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_metadata/creader/struct.CStore.html) and [`CrateMetadata`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_metadata/rmeta/decoder/struct.CrateMetadata.html)).

I think we are too limited here (with AST only) to be able to determine the crates we actually need to import, but it's very likely that I missed something. Maybe `@petrochenkov` or `@Aaron1011` have an idea?

So until we find a way to make it work completely, we need to revert it to fix the ICE. Once merged, we'll need to re-open rust-lang#68427.

r? `@jyn514`
…ethods, r=Amanieu

Add linked list cursor end methods

I add several methods to `LinkedList::CursorMut` and `LinkedList::Cursor`. These methods allow you to access/manipulate the ends of a list via the cursor. This is especially helpful when scanning through a list and reordering. For example:

```rust
let mut c = ll.back_cursor_mut();
let mut moves = 10;
while c.current().map(|x| x > 5).unwrap_or(false) {
    let n = c.remove_current();
    c.push_front(n);
    if moves > 0 { break; } else { moves -= 1; }
}
```
I encountered this problem working on my bachelors thesis doing graph index manipulation.

While this problem can be avoided by splicing, it is awkward. I asked about the problem [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/linked-list-cursurmut-missing-methods/14921/4) and it was suggested I write a PR.

All methods added consist of
```rust
Cursor::front(&self) -> Option<&T>;
Cursor::back(&self) -> Option<&T>;
CursorMut::front(&self) -> Option<&T>;
CursorMut::back(&self) -> Option<&T>;
CursorMut::front_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
CursorMut::back_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
CursorMut::push_front(&mut self, elt: T);
CursorMut::push_back(&mut self, elt: T);
CursorMut::pop_front(&mut self) -> Option<T>;
CursorMut::pop_back(&mut self) -> Option<T>;
```
#### Design decisions:
I tried to remain as consistent as possible with what was already present for linked lists.
The methods `front`, `front_mut`, `back` and `back_mut` are identical to their `LinkedList` equivalents.

I tried to make the `pop_front` and `pop_back` methods work the same way (vis a vis the "ghost" node) as `remove_current`. I thought this was the closest analog.

`push_front` and `push_back` do not change the "current" node, even if it is the "ghost" node. I thought it was most intuitive to say that if you add to the list, current will never change.

Any feedback would be welcome 😄
Document rustfmt on nightly-rustc

- Refactor the doc step for Rustdoc into a macro
- Call the macro for both rustdoc and rustfmt
- Add a `recursion_limit` macro to avoid overflow errors

This does not currently pass --document-private-items for rustfmt due to rust-lang/cargo#8422 (comment).

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` cc `@calebcartwright`
…rochenkov

Skip layout query when computing integer type size during mangling
…jyn514

Stabilize `Bound::cloned()`

This PR stabilizes the function `Bound::cloned()`.

Closes rust-lang#61356.
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jul 2, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=5 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 2, 2021

📌 Commit cd3a48f has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 2, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 2, 2021

⌛ Testing commit cd3a48f with merge ce331ee...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 2, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing ce331ee to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 2, 2021
@bors bors merged commit ce331ee into rust-lang:master Jul 2, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.55.0 milestone Jul 2, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-pr5r37w branch July 2, 2021 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants