Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ rust-analyzer #87878

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2021
Merged

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented Aug 9, 2021

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • These commits modify submodules.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 9, 2021
@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Aug 9, 2021

bors r+

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Aug 9, 2021

@bors r+

(why do I need to use @ in this repo, but not in others?)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 9, 2021

📌 Commit d323063 has been approved by lnicola

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 9, 2021
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

(why do I need to use @ in this repo, but not in others?)

This repo uses a different bot (https://github.com/rust-lang/homu) than https://bors.tech/, which uses https://github.com/bors-ng/bors-ng

@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

cc rust-lang/homu#140

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Aug 9, 2021

Yeah, I figured -- it has a different profile image.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 9, 2021

⌛ Testing commit d323063 with merge d20a2172a3a22a5c0bb43a171c805d305c27ae75...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 9, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 9, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Aug 9, 2021

Can anyone see what went wrong here?

image

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Aug 12, 2021

@bors retry

x86_64-apple died after 2 hours with no logs.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 12, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2021
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#85835 (Implement Extend<(A, B)> for (Extend<A>, Extend<B>))
 - rust-lang#87671 (Warn when an escaped newline skips multiple lines)
 - rust-lang#87878 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#87903 (Reduce verbosity of tracing output of  RUSTC_LOG)
 - rust-lang#87925 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#87928 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#87942 (set the executable bit on pre-commit.sh)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8fe868d into rust-lang:master Aug 12, 2021
@lnicola lnicola deleted the rust-analyzer-2021-08-09 branch August 12, 2021 10:14
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.56.0 milestone Nov 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants