Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a separate error for
dyn Trait
inconst fn
#89021New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a separate error for
dyn Trait
inconst fn
#89021Changes from all commits
f84000d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the cases of fields like this one it would be nice to have a
span_note
pointing at the type and field's type to show how it is a trait object.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be really nice! Can we implement this though? It seems like we only check locals and not expressions:
rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/check.rs
Lines 245 to 259 in f84000d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if we can't get that info from
local.local_info
orlocal.source_info
(I'm not that familiar with const eval and have to relearn it every time I look at it).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, after reading docs I can't see how we can get the expression, but maybe I'm missing something
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you check what the contents of
local.local_info
are? I assume it is going to be aVarBindingForm
. If it is, what are the contents ofopt_match_place
?Alternatively, if the data isn't there, it could potentially be added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So in the case of our interest (field access)
local.local_info
is simplyNone
:(There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, we'll have to make more dramatic changes so that we can track that data :-/
It's probably not high priority, but if you desire to take that on, I'd be more than happy to see it through!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think I'm interested enough in that. Thanks for offering help though!