Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly handle supertraits for min_specialization #89413

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 5, 2021

Conversation

matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

Supertraits of specialization markers could circumvent checks for
min_specialization. Elaborating predicates prevents this.

r? @nikomatsakis

Supertraits of specialization markers could circumvent checks for
min_specialization. Elaborating predicates prevents this.
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2021

📌 Commit 051d5b0 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 4, 2021
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2021
…komatsakis

Correctly handle supertraits for min_specialization

Supertraits of specialization markers could circumvent checks for
min_specialization. Elaborating predicates prevents this.

r? `@nikomatsakis`
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2021
…komatsakis

Correctly handle supertraits for min_specialization

Supertraits of specialization markers could circumvent checks for
min_specialization. Elaborating predicates prevents this.

r? ``@nikomatsakis``
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2021
…komatsakis

Correctly handle supertraits for min_specialization

Supertraits of specialization markers could circumvent checks for
min_specialization. Elaborating predicates prevents this.

r? ```@nikomatsakis```
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2021
…ingjubilee

Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#87993 (Stabilize try_reserve)
 - rust-lang#88090 (Perform type inference in range pattern)
 - rust-lang#88780 (Added abs_diff for integer types.)
 - rust-lang#89270 (path.push() should work as expected on windows verbatim paths)
 - rust-lang#89413 (Correctly handle supertraits for min_specialization)
 - rust-lang#89456 (Update to the final LLVM 13.0.0 release)
 - rust-lang#89466 (Fix bug with query modifier parsing)
 - rust-lang#89473 (Fix extra `non_snake_case` warning for shorthand field bindings)
 - rust-lang#89474 (rustdoc: Improve doctest pass's name and module's name)
 - rust-lang#89478 (Fixed numerus of error message)
 - rust-lang#89480 (Add test for issue 89118.)
 - rust-lang#89487 (Try to recover from a `=>` -> `=` or `->` typo in a match arm)
 - rust-lang#89494 (Deny `where` clauses on `auto` traits)
 - rust-lang#89511 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#89536 (update Miri)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 05b4cd6 into rust-lang:master Oct 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Oct 5, 2021
@matthewjasper matthewjasper deleted the spec-marker-fix branch October 5, 2021 07:34
@workingjubilee workingjubilee added the F-min_specialization `#![feature(min_specialization)]` label Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
F-min_specialization `#![feature(min_specialization)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants