Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apply clippy suggestions for rustc and core #89709
Apply clippy suggestions for rustc and core #89709
Changes from all commits
71dd0b9
b8c151c
14b6cf6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice if we could use
debug_assert_matches!
(assuming it exists) for range checks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
debug_assert_matches!
is currently unstableThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Compiler code can use unstable library features.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@clemenswasser If this PR is re-landed (after the #89905 revert), it would be good to fix this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible
enumerate
is less efficient than range iteration?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know other data structures have some instances of open coding
map
to reduce the amount of monomorphization bloat that needs to be compiled, so this is a potential perf culpritThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would worry less about bloat and more about that instance of
Option::map
having the closure inlined into it, but not being inlined itself (because of inliningswap_remove
?).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't get to this in time, but
xs[range].iter_mut()
should just be writen&mut xs[range]
- surprised clippy doesn't have a lint for this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This entire thing can just be
self.words[start..end].fill(!0)
, just realized.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, removing redundant
&
should maybe be more forcefully handled (i.e.deny
ed inrustc
crates) - and if you open a PR with just that lint being accounted for, I will r+ it immediately.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a simple way I can
deny
the lints for allrustc
crates, without copy pasting in alllib.rs
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In theory we could simply deny the lint via x.py clippy, but in reality it seems that
--cap-lints warn
prevents this from working 😆