-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check implementing type for #[doc(hidden)]
#89987
Conversation
r? @jackh726 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
a599b83
to
bc5ed6e
Compare
r? rust-lang/rustdoc |
Apart from the nit, looks good to me, thanks for the improvement/fix! Feel free to r+ if you think the suggestion I made isn't worth it. |
@GuillaumeGomez Is it alright if I like the original code a little better? 😇 (Also, I don't have |
It's perfectly fine. :) Then let's go with this this! @bors: r+ squash |
📌 Commit 8f2551d0dbdd066914ece68d312038a957d6eeea has been approved by |
8f2551d
to
d39a1be
Compare
See rust-lang/homu#136 and rust-lang/homu#158 for more information. |
Done. |
Thanks! @bors r=@GuillaumeGomez rollup |
📌 Commit d39a1be has been approved by |
…c, r=GuillaumeGomez Check implementing type for `#[doc(hidden)]` Closes rust-lang#85526.
…c, r=GuillaumeGomez Check implementing type for `#[doc(hidden)]` Closes rust-lang#85526.
…askrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#89950 (bootstrap: tweak verbosity settings) - rust-lang#89965 (Fix ICE with `let...else` and `ref mut`) - rust-lang#89974 (Nicer error message if the user attempts to do let...else if) - rust-lang#89987 (Check implementing type for `#[doc(hidden)]`) - rust-lang#89989 (rustdoc: Add static size assertion for `clean::Type`) - rust-lang#89990 (rustc_span: `Ident::invalid` -> `Ident::empty`) - rust-lang#89993 (Remove dead code from `compiletest::json`) - rust-lang#89996 (Bump backtrace) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@camelid is there a reason you assigned Guillaume instead of a T-compiler reviewer? That seems pretty solidly in their wheelhouse to me ... missing_docs is not a rustdoc lint. |
I'm the one who implemented it, so I guess it's the reason? ;) |
My understanding was that we (T-rustdoc) are mainly the ones who maintain it, just like with the checks in |
Closes #85526.