Rollup of 9 pull requests #90590
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #90590
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since rustc doesn't do the assembly parsing itself, it is unable to detect when inline assembly ends with an instruction prefix, which doesn't make sense since it would apply to instructions from the compiler. This fixes rust-lang#82314 by mentioning that x86 instruction prefixes must not be used in inline assembly.
Inspired by rust-lang#90521 , and by the various `must_use` PRs; in all of those cases, the submitter of the PR could know that `relnotes` applied, but couldn't apply it themselves.
People should be able to help triage by observing that a change needs an FCP before we can apply it.
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Now AddressSanitizerOptions is a struct, but at least the change was tiny. r? nikic
…r=notriddle Simplify js tester a bit r? ```@notriddle```
Add note about x86 instruction prefixes in asm! to unstable book Since rustc doesn't do the assembly parsing itself, it is unable to detect when inline assembly ends with an instruction prefix, which doesn't make sense since it would apply to instructions from the compiler. This fixes rust-lang#82314 by mentioning that x86 instruction prefixes must not be used in inline assembly. AFAICT x86 is the only instruction set with instruction prefixes.
…henkov Demote metadata load warning to "info". There is a warn log message for whenever the crate loader fails to load metadata from a candidate file. I think this warning is too aggressive, as there are several situations where metadata information might not be found in a candidate file, which is normal. Also, this warning is somewhat confusing, and non-actionable in most cases for a user (most users will not know what it means). If the crate loader ultimately does not find a valid crate, then an error will be reported (and hopefully rust-lang#88368 will improve that error message). If a rustc developer wants to debug a loader problem, they can still use `RUSTC_LOG=rustc_metadata=debug` and get the details. There is more discussion of this particular warning at rust-lang#89795 (comment). Fixes rust-lang#90525
…oshtriplett Clean up some `-Z unstable-options` in tests. Several of these tests were for features that have been stabilized, or otherwise don't need `-Z unstable-options`.
…riplett
Add more text and examples to `carrying_{add|mul}`
`feature(bigint_helper_methods)` tracking issue rust-lang#85532
cc ```@clarfonthey```
…r=Mark-Simulacrum rustbot allow labels `relnotes` was inspired by rust-lang#90521 , and by the various `must_use` PRs; in all of those cases, the submitter of the PR could know that `relnotes` applied, but couldn't apply it themselves. For `needs-fcp`, I think people should be able to help triage by observing that a change needs an FCP before we can apply it.
…r-sidebar, r=jsha Fix missing bottom border for headings in sidebar Fixes rust-lang#90568. r? `@jsha`
…n514 Fix ICE when rustdoc is scraping examples inside of a proc macro This PR provides a clearer semantics for how --scrape-examples interacts with macros. If an expression's span AND it's enclosing item's span both are not `from_expansion`, then the example will be scraped. The added test case `rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` shows a variety of situations. * A macro-rules macro that takes a function call as input: good * A macro-rules macro that generates a function call as output: bad * A proc-macro that generates a function call as output: bad * An attribute macro that generates a function call as output: bad * An attribute macro that takes a function call as input: good, if the proc macro is designed to propagate the input spans I ran this updated rustdoc on pyo3 and confirmed that it successfully scrapes examples from inside a proc macro, eg <img width="1013" alt="Screen Shot 2021-11-04 at 1 11 28 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/663326/140412691-81a3bb6b-a448-4a1b-a293-f7a795553634.png"> (cc `@mejrs)` Additionally, this PR fixes an ordering bug in the highlighting logic. Fixes rust-lang#90567. r? `@jyn514`
…ikic rustc_llvm: update PassWrapper for recent LLVM Now AddressSanitizerOptions is a struct, but at least the change was tiny. r? `@nikic`
|
@bors r+ p=9 rollup=never |
|
📌 Commit 167777f has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
#90589 was changed |
|
eh.. thanks, I'll exclude it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
-Z unstable-optionsin tests. #90554 (Clean up some-Z unstable-optionsin tests.)carrying_{add|mul}#90556 (Add more text and examples tocarrying_{add|mul})Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup