Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[crater experiment] do the opposite of what zip side-effect documentation currently guarantees #91031

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

the8472
Copy link
Member

@the8472 the8472 commented Nov 19, 2021

Improved crater experiment to elucidate the possibility of completely removing the guarantee that was added in #52279, suggested by @steffahn in #83791 (comment)

That it was already used in linkedlist doesn't bode well. 😢

r? @ghost

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@the8472
Copy link
Member Author

the8472 commented Nov 20, 2021

Preparing for a crater run.

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 20, 2021

⌛ Trying commit 14cb270 with merge 722e1797249a965b6335aebd65d777f917e498f1...

@the8472 the8472 changed the title [Experiment] do the opposite of what zip side-effect documentation currently guarantees [crater experiment] do the opposite of what zip side-effect documentation currently guarantees Nov 20, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 20, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 722e1797249a965b6335aebd65d777f917e498f1 (722e1797249a965b6335aebd65d777f917e498f1)

@the8472
Copy link
Member Author

the8472 commented Nov 20, 2021

@craterbot run mode=build-and-test

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

👌 Experiment pr-91031 created and queued.
🤖 Automatically detected try build 722e1797249a965b6335aebd65d777f917e498f1
🔍 You can check out the queue and this experiment's details.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added the S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. label Nov 20, 2021
@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚧 Experiment pr-91031 is now running

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚨 Experiment pr-91031 has encountered an error: docker is not running
🛠️ If the error is fixed use the retry command.

🆘 Can someone from the infra team check in on this? @rust-lang/infra
ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@the8472
Copy link
Member Author

the8472 commented Nov 23, 2021

@craterbot retry

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🛠️ Experiment pr-91031 queued again.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚧 Experiment pr-91031 is now running

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@craterbot retry-report

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🛠️ Generation of the report for pr-91031 queued again.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 Experiment pr-91031 is completed!
📊 94 regressed and 82 fixed (194633 total)
📰 Open the full report.

⚠️ If you notice any spurious failure please add them to the blacklist!
ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@craterbot craterbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-crater Status: Waiting on a crater run to be completed. labels Nov 30, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Results will still be here if/when desired, but closing the PR itself to get it out of our queue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants