-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustdoc: Remove ResolvedPath.did
#91195
Conversation
Before, if `register_res` were called on an associated item or enum variant, it would return the parent's `DefId`. Now, it returns the actual `DefId`. This change is a step toward removing `Type::ResolvedPath.did` and potentially removing `kind_side_channel` in rustdoc. It also just simplifies rustdoc's behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not really comfortable approving this ... I like the idea in theory, but it seems very strange that none of the tests broke, and I worry something has broken without us realizing.
I'm not sure if it's very strange; I did update the href code (which IIRC caused lots of tests to fail before I updated it). |
📌 Commit 4365112 has been approved by |
Oh, it would be nice to fix #91195 (comment) either here or in a follow up though. |
And I forgot about #91195 (comment) 🤦 r=me with those two done though @bors r- |
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <github@jyn.dev>
@bors r=jyn514 rollup=iffy (to make bisecting easier if necessary) |
📌 Commit 617bbb2 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 617bbb2 with merge 49b989201328d8a1714cffe31906a0a40ad92044... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (862962b): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Instructions improvements up to -0.1% and max-rss improvements up to -1% on doc builds :D |
ResolvedPath.did
was not actually the same as.path.def_id()
. Instead,.did
referred to theDefId
of the page to be used as a hyperlink target.For example, a link to
Struct::method()
would useStruct
'sDefId
as its.did
field. This behavior is confusing, easy to accidentally misuse, and caninstead be obtained on-demand when computing hyperlink targets. It's also likely
part of the reason
kind_side_channel
exists. I'm currently working on someexperimental refactorings in
collect_intra_doc_links
that I believe require --or at least benefit from -- removing
.did
.r? @jyn514