Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

miri: lift restriction on extern types being the only field in a struct #91910

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 3 additions & 13 deletions compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/eval_context.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -616,19 +616,9 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
match self.size_and_align_of(metadata, &field)? {
Some(size_and_align) => size_and_align,
None => {
// A field with extern type. If this field is at offset 0, we behave
// like the underlying extern type.
// FIXME: Once we have made decisions for how to handle size and alignment
// of `extern type`, this should be adapted. It is just a temporary hack
// to get some code to work that probably ought to work.
if sized_size == Size::ZERO {
return Ok(None);
} else {
span_bug!(
self.cur_span(),
"Fields cannot be extern types, unless they are at offset 0"
)
}
// A field with an extern type. We don't know the actual dynamic size
// or the alignment.
return Ok(None);
}
};

Expand Down
22 changes: 8 additions & 14 deletions compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -362,21 +362,15 @@ where
// Re-use parent metadata to determine dynamic field layout.
// With custom DSTS, this *will* execute user-defined code, but the same
// happens at run-time so that's okay.
let align = match self.size_and_align_of(&base.meta, &field_layout)? {
Some((_, align)) => align,
None if offset == Size::ZERO => {
// An extern type at offset 0, we fall back to its static alignment.
// FIXME: Once we have made decisions for how to handle size and alignment
// of `extern type`, this should be adapted. It is just a temporary hack
// to get some code to work that probably ought to work.
field_layout.align.abi
match self.size_and_align_of(&base.meta, &field_layout)? {
Some((_, align)) => (base.meta, offset.align_to(align)),
None => {
// For unsized types with an extern type tail we perform no adjustments.
// NOTE: keep this in sync with `PlaceRef::project_field` in the codegen backend.
assert!(matches!(base.meta, MemPlaceMeta::None));
(base.meta, offset)
}
None => span_bug!(
self.cur_span(),
"cannot compute offset for extern type field at non-0 offset"
),
};
(base.meta, offset.align_to(align))
}
} else {
// base.meta could be present; we might be accessing a sized field of an unsized
// struct.
Expand Down
58 changes: 58 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/issue-91827-extern-types.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
// run-pass
//
// Test that we can handle unsized types with an extern type tail part.
// Regression test for issue #91827.

#![feature(const_ptr_offset_from)]
#![feature(const_slice_from_raw_parts)]
#![feature(extern_types)]

use std::ptr::addr_of;

extern "C" {
type Opaque;
}

unsafe impl Sync for Opaque {}

#[repr(C)]
pub struct List<T> {
len: usize,
data: [T; 0],
tail: Opaque,
}

#[repr(C)]
pub struct ListImpl<T, const N: usize> {
len: usize,
data: [T; N],
}

impl<T> List<T> {
const fn as_slice(&self) -> &[T] {
unsafe { std::slice::from_raw_parts(self.data.as_ptr(), self.len) }
}
}

impl<T, const N: usize> ListImpl<T, N> {
const fn as_list(&self) -> &List<T> {
unsafe { std::mem::transmute(self) }
}
}

pub static A: ListImpl<u128, 3> = ListImpl {
len: 3,
data: [5, 6, 7],
};
pub static A_REF: &'static List<u128> = A.as_list();
pub static A_TAIL_OFFSET: isize = tail_offset(A.as_list());

const fn tail_offset<T>(list: &List<T>) -> isize {
unsafe { (addr_of!(list.tail) as *const u8).offset_from(list as *const List<T> as *const u8) }
}

fn main() {
assert_eq!(A_REF.as_slice(), &[5, 6, 7]);
// Check that interpreter and code generation agree about the position of the tail field.
assert_eq!(A_TAIL_OFFSET, tail_offset(A_REF));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice test. :)

I wonder if there are corner cases that make it more challenging, like newtype-wrapping Opaque in a repr(align) type to ensure it has alignment larger than usize?

}