Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #92060

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lnicola and others added 17 commits December 14, 2021 17:03
For a data section, the object crate will set SHF_ALLOC by default,
which is exactly what we don't want. Use a debug section instead,
the same as we do for .rmeta.
…ult-methods, r=oli-obk

Mark defaulted `PartialEq`/`PartialOrd` methods as const

WIthout it, `const` impls of these traits are unpleasant to write. I think this kind of change is allowed now. although it looks like it might require some Miri tweaks. Let's find out.

r? ``@fee1-dead``
…estebank

Improve suggestion to change struct field to &mut

r? `@estebank`

Now displays a proper underline style suggestion instead of including the code change inline with the message.
…=lnicola

⬆️ rust-analyzer

r? ``@ghost``
…d, r=kennytm

Revert "socket ancillary data implementation for dragonflybsd."

Reverts rust-lang#91553
Use debug section for .rustc

For a data section, the object crate will set SHF_ALLOC by default, which is exactly what we don't want. Use a debug section instead, the same as we do for .rmeta.

I checked with `objdump -h` that this produces the right flags for ELF.

Fixes rust-lang#92013.
Update stdlib to the 2021 edition

progress towards rust-lang#88638

I couldnt find a way to run the 2018 style panic tests against 2018 so I just deleted them, maybe theres a way to do it that I missed though?
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 18, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 18, 2021

📌 Commit db8c560 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Dec 18, 2021
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Dec 18, 2021

You'll want to take #92029 out of this one, it failed in the previous rollup.

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, thanks!

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-kon3cdk branch January 2, 2022 22:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants