Rollup of 4 pull requests #92106
Rollup of 4 pull requests #92106
Conversation
This crate actually had a typo `'ctx` in one of its functions:
```diff
-pub fn same_type_modulo_infer(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'ctx>) -> bool {
+pub fn same_type_modulo_infer<'tcx>(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
```
For a data section, the object crate will set the SHF_ALLOC by default, which is exactly what we don't want. Explicitly set sh_flags to zero to avoid this.
Co-authored-by: Simonas Kazlauskas <github@kazlauskas.me>
Fix an ICE when lowering a float with missing exponent magnitude This fixes: rust-lang#91434
…r=Aaron1011 Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_infer` See rust-lang#91867 for more information. This crate actually had a typo `'ctx` in one of its functions: ```diff -pub fn same_type_modulo_infer(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'ctx>) -> bool { +pub fn same_type_modulo_infer<'tcx>(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool { ``` Also, I wasn't entirely sure about the lifetimes in `suggest_new_region_bound`: ```diff pub fn suggest_new_region_bound( - tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, + tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>, fn_returns: Vec<&rustc_hir::Ty<'_>>, ``` Should all of those lifetimes really be distinct?
Remove `in_band_lifetimes` for `rustc_monomorphize` rust-lang#91867
Explicitly set no ELF flags for .rustc section For a data section, the object crate will set the SHF_ALLOC by default, which is exactly what we don't want. Explicitly set sh_flags to zero to avoid this. I checked with `objdump -h` that this produces the right flags for ELF. Fixes rust-lang#92013.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=4 |
|
📌 Commit 9415c67 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (e95e084): comparison url. Summary: This change led to moderate relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
Successful merges:
in_band_lifetimesfromrustc_infer#91878 (Removein_band_lifetimesfromrustc_infer)in_band_lifetimesforrustc_monomorphize#91895 (Removein_band_lifetimesforrustc_monomorphize)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup