Exclude "test" from doc_auto_cfg #92856
Conversation
rustbot
added
the
T-rustdoc
|
Some changes occurred in cc @camelid |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
exclude-test-doc_auto_cfg
branch
from
f985f66 to
a03d615
Compare
|
The rendered updated test looks like this: |
src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Couldn't we just add test into the hidden_cfg?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah wait, that would need the other change to apply the hiding to sub-expressions rather than the expression as a whole.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yep, hence why I didn't. ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if it would be good to make that change first, so we don't need the extra code here specifically to handle test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You mean putting test in hidden_cfg and then simply pass hidden_cfg to Cfg::parse_without instead of &[sym::test]?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Nemo157: That won't be possible as is because cfg_hide is to hide explicitly a cfg (any(not(feature = "miri-test-libstd"), test, doctest) for example) whereas this PR is to remove any appearances of test. The goals are completely different.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not really, test is just a very simple cfg-expression that could be hidden as more complex expressions can. As mentioned on the linked issue we can have cfg_hide hide arbitrary sub-expressions of the overall cfg. So e.g. if test is hidden any(not(test), foo) would simplify to foo, and if both test and feature = "__internal" are hidden then any(test, feature = "__internal") would simplify to nothing at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hum ok... Let me give it another try.
|
r? @Nemo157 |
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
exclude-test-doc_auto_cfg
branch
from
a03d615 to
741d75d
Compare
|
I rebased on top of master but didn't change anything else otherwise. |
|
@Nemo157 It now removes |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
exclude-test-doc_auto_cfg
branch
from
f2e1bca to
9150911
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
exclude-test-doc_auto_cfg
branch
from
9150911 to
b0df765
Compare
|
@bors: r=Nemo157 |
|
📌 Commit b0df765 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
…askrgr Rollup of 17 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91032 (Introduce drop range tracking to generator interior analysis) - rust-lang#92856 (Exclude "test" from doc_auto_cfg) - rust-lang#92860 (Fix errors on blanket impls by ignoring the children of generated impls) - rust-lang#93038 (Fix star handling in block doc comments) - rust-lang#93061 (Only suggest adding `!` to expressions that can be macro invocation) - rust-lang#93067 (rustdoc mobile: fix scroll offset when jumping to internal id) - rust-lang#93086 (Add tests to ensure that `let_chains` works with `if_let_guard`) - rust-lang#93087 (Fix src/test/run-make/raw-dylib-alt-calling-convention) - rust-lang#93091 (⬆ chalk to 0.76.0) - rust-lang#93094 (src/test/rustdoc-json: Check for `struct_field`s in `variant_tuple_struct.rs`) - rust-lang#93098 (Show a more informative panic message when `DefPathHash` does not exist) - rust-lang#93099 (rustdoc: auto create output directory when "--output-format json") - rust-lang#93102 (Pretty printer algorithm revamp step 3) - rust-lang#93104 (Support --bless for pp-exact pretty printer tests) - rust-lang#93114 (update comment for `ensure_monomorphic_enough`) - rust-lang#93128 (Add script to prevent point releases with same number as existing ones) - rust-lang#93136 (Backport the 1.58.1 release notes to master) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
7 participants
Fixes #91740.
cc @Nemo157 (you were the one suggesting this iirc)
r? @camelid