Ignore io::process tests #9342
Merged
Ignore io::process tests #9342
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
They're causing syscalls to get interrupted, and std::io doesn't correctly handle EINTR
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2013
…brson They're causing syscalls to get interrupted, and std::io doesn't correctly handle EINTR
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2022
Suggest `Entry::or_default` for `Entry::or_insert(Default::default())` Unlike past similar work done in rust-lang#6228, expand the existing `or_fun_call` lint to detect `or_insert` calls with a `T::new()` or `T::default()` argument, much like currently done for `unwrap_or` calls. In that case, suggest the use of `or_default`, which is more idiomatic. Note that even with this change, `or_insert_with(T::default)` calls aren't detected as candidates for `or_default()`, in the same manner that currently `unwrap_or_else(T::default)` calls aren't detected as candidates for `unwrap_or_default()`. Also, as a nearby cleanup, change `KNOW_TYPES` from `static` to `const`, since as far as I understand it's preferred (should Clippy have a lint for that?). Addresses rust-lang#3812. *Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)* changelog: [`or_fun_call`]: Suggest `Entry::or_default` for `Entry::or_insert(Default::default())`
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
`unwrap_or_else_default` -> `unwrap_or_default` and improve resulting lint Resolves rust-lang#10080 (though it doesn't implement exactly what's described there) This PR does the following: 1. Merges `unwrap_or_else_default.rs`'s code into `or_fun_call.rs` 2. Extracts the code to handle `unwrap_or(/* default value */)` and similar, and moves it into `unwrap_or_else_default` 3. Implements the missing functionality from rust-lang#9342, e.g.,, to handle `or_insert_with(Default::default)` 4. Renames `unwrap_or_else_default` to `unwrap_or_default` (since the "new" lint handles both `unwrap_or` and `unwrap_or_else`, it seemed sensible to use the shortened name) This PR is currently two commits. The first implements 1-3, the second implements 4. A word about 2: the `or_fun_call` lint currently produces warnings like the following: ``` error: use of `unwrap_or` followed by a call to `new` --> $DIR/or_fun_call.rs:56:14 | LL | with_new.unwrap_or(Vec::new()); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `unwrap_or_default()` ``` To me, such warnings look like they should come from `unwrap_or_else_default`, not `or_fun_call`, especially since `or_fun_call` is [in the nursery](rust-lang/rust-clippy#9829). --- changelog: Move: Renamed `unwrap_or_else_default` to [`unwrap_or_default`] [rust-lang#10120](rust-lang/rust-clippy#10120) changelog: Enhancement: [`unwrap_or_default`]: Now handles more functions, like `or_insert_with` [rust-lang#10120](rust-lang/rust-clippy#10120) <!-- changelog_checked-->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
They're causing syscalls to get interrupted, and std::io doesn't correctly
handle EINTR