-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Allow trait A: ~const B
#93429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow trait A: ~const B
#93429
Conversation
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit f4f7e399acdf9bb1afca576813ee9df908905c71 with merge 72e8656aa863887169592704ae8dec6b8830d2d3... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 72e8656aa863887169592704ae8dec6b8830d2d3 with parent 24ae996, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (72e8656aa863887169592704ae8dec6b8830d2d3): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never |
f4f7e39
to
6715c6f
Compare
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
⌛ Trying commit 6715c6f00a03e9ccee5e7d51e80225cb4eaa66f4 with merge 37c82a23e1cc44e9a141a3281f6c91f25eec6d8a... |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 37c82a23e1cc44e9a141a3281f6c91f25eec6d8a with parent 2e43d06, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (37c82a23e1cc44e9a141a3281f6c91f25eec6d8a): comparison url. Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
@oli-obk is this okay to merge now? |
6715c6f
to
6660227
Compare
@bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (b4151a4): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
`[ref:const_supertraits]` has been resolved by [rust-lang/rust#93429][1]. [1]: rust-lang/rust#93429
What's included: a minimal working change set for
~const
supertraits to work.r? @oli-obk