-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement --check-cfg option (RFC 3013), take 2 #93915
Conversation
I have address all the review comments and added tests for the uncovered error cases. @rustbot ready |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I have fix the last review comments (except for @rustbot ready |
r=me after addressing #93915 (comment) and squashing commits. |
Co-authored-by: Urgau <lolo.branstett@numericable.fr> Co-authored-by: Marcelina Kościelnicka <mwk@0x04.net>
Addressed and squashed, but I don't have bors permissions so I can't r=you. @rustbot ready |
Thanks! |
📌 Commit 3a73ca5 has been approved by |
…askrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#89892 (Suggest `impl Trait` return type when incorrectly using a generic return type) - rust-lang#91675 (Add MemTagSanitizer Support) - rust-lang#92806 (Add more information to `impl Trait` error) - rust-lang#93497 (Pass `--test` flag through rustdoc to rustc so `#[test]` functions can be scraped) - rust-lang#93814 (mips64-openwrt-linux-musl: correct soft-foat) - rust-lang#93847 (kmc-solid: Use the filesystem thread-safety wrapper) - rust-lang#93877 (asm: Allow the use of r8-r14 as clobbers on Thumb1) - rust-lang#93892 (Only mark projection as ambiguous if GAT substs are constrained) - rust-lang#93915 (Implement --check-cfg option (RFC 3013), take 2) - rust-lang#93953 (Add the `known-bug` test directive, use it, and do some cleanup) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…eGomez Wire up unstable rustc --check-cfg to rustdoc This pull-request wire up the new unstable `--check-cfg` option from `rustc` to `rustdoc` as [requested](rust-lang#93915 (comment)) in the [pull-request](rust-lang#93915) that introduce `--check-cfg`. The motivation was describe in the original PR by `@jyn514` who wrote rust-lang#89346 (comment): > > add plumbing to pass --check-cfg from rustdoc (do we want this one?) > > It would be useful, I think, it catches issues like cfg(doctst) or something (and in general I would like expansion to match rustc as closely as possible).
…eGomez Wire up unstable rustc --check-cfg to rustdoc This pull-request wire up the new unstable `--check-cfg` option from `rustc` to `rustdoc` as [requested](rust-lang#93915 (comment)) in the [pull-request](rust-lang#93915) that introduce `--check-cfg`. The motivation was describe in the original PR by ``@jyn514`` who wrote rust-lang#89346 (comment): > > add plumbing to pass --check-cfg from rustdoc (do we want this one?) > > It would be useful, I think, it catches issues like cfg(doctst) or something (and in general I would like expansion to match rustc as closely as possible).
This pull-request implement RFC 3013: Checking conditional compilation at compile time (rust-lang/rfcs#3013) and is based on the previous attempt #89346 by @mwkmwkmwk that was closed due to inactivity.
I have address all the review comments from the previous attempt and added some more tests.
cc #82450
r? @petrochenkov