-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[beta] backports #93922
[beta] backports #93922
Conversation
|
@bors r+ rollup=never |
📌 Commit 22f1800 has been approved by |
@bors p=1 since we want to do a crater run on the beta resulting from this, and release deadline is pretty close. |
⌛ Testing commit 22f1800 with merge 7f1c8c6319579c6d8b13b046c5df947cb3520838... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
0de7802
to
8b2c687
Compare
* the logic only checked for / but not for \ * verbatim paths shouldn't skip items at all since they don't get normalized * the extra branches get optimized out on unix since is_sep_byte is a trivial comparison and is_verbatim is always-false * tests lacked windows coverage for these cases That lead to equal paths not having equal hashes and to unnecessary collisions.
A fix applied to std::Path::hash triggers a miscompilation/assert in LLVM in this test on wasm32. The miscompilation appears to pre-existing. Reverting some previous changes done std::Path also trigger it and slight modifications such as changing the test path from "a" to "ccccccccccc" also make it pass, indicating it's very flaky. Since the fix is for a higher-tier platform than wasm it takes precedence.
@bors r+ rollup=never |
📌 Commit 0ac18e7 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This backports:
r? @Mark-Simulacrum