Rollup of 9 pull requests #94103
Merged
Rollup of 9 pull requests #94103
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Tweaked `try_collect()` to accept more `Try` types Updated feature attribute for tracking issue
Signed-off-by: Alex Saveau <saveau.alexandre@gmail.com>
I have found this code confusing for years. I've always roughly understood it, but never exactly. I just made my fourth(?) attempt and finally cracked it. This commit improves the comments. In particular, it explicitly describes how you can't do a custom fold/visit of any type; there are actually a handful of "types of interest" (e.g. `Ty`, `Predicate`, `Region`, `Const`) that can be custom folded/visted, and all other types just get a generic traversal. I think this was the part that eluded me on all my prior attempts at understanding. The commit also updates comments to account for some newer changes such as the fallible/infallible folding distinction, does some minor reorderings, and moves one `impl` to a better place.
It seems to be unused and it is incorrect for arm/aarch64 anyway.
Update tracking issue numbers for inline assembly sub-features The main tracking issue for inline assembly is [closed](rust-lang#72016 (comment)), further tracking of the remaining sub-features has been moved to separate tracking issues.
…s, r=BoxyUwU Improve comments about type folding/visiting. I have found this code confusing for years. I've always roughly understood it, but never exactly. I just made my fourth(?) attempt and finally cracked it. This commit improves the comments. In particular, it explicitly describes how you can't do a custom fold/visit of any type; there are actually a handful of "types of interest" (e.g. `Ty`, `Predicate`, `Region`, `Const`) that can be custom folded/visted, and all other types just get a generic traversal. I think this was the part that eluded me on all my prior attempts at understanding. The commit also updates comments to account for some newer changes such as the fallible/infallible folding distinction, does some minor reorderings, and moves one `impl` to a better place. r? `@BoxyUwU`
…jsha Generate list instead of div items in sidebar Fixes rust-lang#92986. Surprisingly, we didn't have much CSS for this... [Demo](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/links-in-sidebar/std/index.html). r? `@jsha`
Add MAIN_SEPARATOR_STR
Currently, if someone needs access to the path separator as a str, they need to go through this mess:
```rust
unsafe {
std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(slice::from_ref(&(MAIN_SEPARATOR as u8)))
}
```
This PR just re-exports an existing path separator str API.
Even more let_else adoptions Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046, rust-lang#93590.
Add a `try_collect()` helper method to `Iterator` Implement `Iterator::try_collect()` as a helper around `Iterator::collect()` as discussed [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/idea-fallible-iterator-mapping-with-try-map/15715/5?u=a.lafrance). First time contributor so definitely open to any feedback about my implementation! Specifically wondering if I should open a tracking issue for the unstable feature I introduced. As the main participant in the internals discussion: r? `@scottmcm`
Fix ICE when using Box<T, A> with pointer sized A Fixes rust-lang#78459 Note that using `Box<T, A>` with a more than pointer sized `A` or using a pointer sized `A` with a Box of a DST will produce a different ICE (rust-lang#92054) which is not fixed by this PR.
…Simulacrum Remove CFG_PLATFORM It seems to be unused and it is incorrect for arm/aarch64 anyway.
…p_fix, r=Manishearth Clippy: Don't lint `needless_borrow` in method receiver positions r? `@Manishearth` cc `@camsteffen` `@Jarcho` cc rust-lang/rust-clippy#8441 Let's get this fix in before the beta branching tomorrow.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
|
📌 Commit 39c1748 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Feb 18, 2022
|
Finished benchmarking commit (73a7423): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run shows 13 relevant regressions 😿 to instruction counts.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
|
@matthiaskrgr none of the rolled up PRs here seem remotely suspicious as to why there would be a performance regression. Any ideas? |
|
Yeah, the only thing that looks like it might have a very very slight performance impact is the ICE-fix but maybe it is just unlucky noise..? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
try_collect()helper method toIterator#94041 (Add atry_collect()helper method toIterator)needless_borrowin method receiver positions #94085 (Clippy: Don't lintneedless_borrowin method receiver positions)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup