-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve rustdoc book #94753
Merged
Merged
Improve rustdoc book #94753
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 8, 2022
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Urgau
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-book-improvements
branch
from
March 8, 2022 22:45
cb266fa
to
9457691
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Urgau
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-book-improvements
branch
from
March 8, 2022 23:56
9457691
to
4e067e8
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2022
Thanks! Please ping me once CI pass. |
Urgau
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-book-improvements
branch
from
March 9, 2022 11:45
102b8bc
to
5a3cb69
Compare
Urgau
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-book-improvements
branch
from
March 9, 2022 12:46
5a3cb69
to
e346920
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2022
@bors: r+ rollup |
📌 Commit e346920 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 9, 2022
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2022
…GuillaumeGomez Improve rustdoc book This pull-request improves the `rustdoc` book by doing some (light) cleanup, by merging some stuff, by adding some missing stuff (like tracking issues links, for those who had one) and also by moving some chapter's into sub-chapter's to improve the flow of the book. ~~Note that I locally tested with `mdbook-lintcheck` that no links became accidentally broken.~~ (Not enough, ;-)) r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2022
…GuillaumeGomez Improve rustdoc book This pull-request improves the `rustdoc` book by doing some (light) cleanup, by merging some stuff, by adding some missing stuff (like tracking issues links, for those who had one) and also by moving some chapter's into sub-chapter's to improve the flow of the book. ~~Note that I locally tested with `mdbook-lintcheck` that no links became accidentally broken.~~ (Not enough, ;-)) r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2022
…GuillaumeGomez Improve rustdoc book This pull-request improves the `rustdoc` book by doing some (light) cleanup, by merging some stuff, by adding some missing stuff (like tracking issues links, for those who had one) and also by moving some chapter's into sub-chapter's to improve the flow of the book. ~~Note that I locally tested with `mdbook-lintcheck` that no links became accidentally broken.~~ (Not enough, ;-)) r? ````@GuillaumeGomez````
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94440 (Better error for normalization errors from parent crates that use `#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]`) - rust-lang#94587 (Document new recommended use of `FromIterator::from_iter`) - rust-lang#94644 (Fix soundness issue in scoped threads.) - rust-lang#94740 (Unify impl blocks by wrapping them into a div) - rust-lang#94753 (Improve rustdoc book) - rust-lang#94796 (Allow `cargo run` instead of `cargo run -p bootstrap`) - rust-lang#94805 (Revert accidental stabilization) - rust-lang#94809 (RustWrapper: add missing include) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2022
…notriddle rustdoc: add missing URL redirect rust-lang#94753 missed some redirect settings, and one of the missing URL shows up in an error message. This PR adds those redirects.
RalfJung
pushed a commit
to RalfJung/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2022
rustdoc: add missing URL redirect rust-lang/rust#94753 missed some redirect settings, and one of the missing URL shows up in an error message. This PR adds those redirects.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull-request improves the
rustdoc
book by doing some (light) cleanup, by merging some stuff, by adding some missing stuff (like tracking issues links, for those who had one) and also by moving some chapter's into sub-chapter's to improve the flow of the book.Note that I locally tested with(Not enough, ;-))mdbook-lintcheck
that no links became accidentally broken.r? @GuillaumeGomez