Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EXPERIMENT: derive Debug as a single function call #95637

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

scottmcm
Copy link
Member

@scottmcm scottmcm commented Apr 4, 2022

Rather than needing a bunch of method calls, build arrays of the names and values, leaving the loop up to the implementation in core. DebugStruct::field is already using &dyn Debug, after all.

r? @ghost

Rather than needing a bunch of method calls, build arrays of the names and values, leaving the loop up to the implementation in core.
@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 4, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

scottmcm commented Apr 4, 2022

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 4, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 4, 2022

⌛ Trying commit 8aa2c66 with merge a6295bd5c15c45e144c1cb2460888cfcae521b7d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 4, 2022

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a6295bd5c15c45e144c1cb2460888cfcae521b7d (a6295bd5c15c45e144c1cb2460888cfcae521b7d)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued a6295bd5c15c45e144c1cb2460888cfcae521b7d with parent ec667fb, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a6295bd5c15c45e144c1cb2460888cfcae521b7d): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: mixed results
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 16 10 34 12 50
mean2 1.0% 0.8% -0.5% -0.4% -0.0%
max 2.7% 1.7% -1.3% -0.5% 2.7%

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Apr 4, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

scottmcm commented Apr 9, 2022

I'll have to do more to fix diesel, apparently, so I don't need this open in the mean time.

@scottmcm scottmcm closed this Apr 9, 2022
nnethercote added a commit to nnethercote/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
This commit adds new methods that combine sequences of existing
formatting methods.
- `Formatter::debug_{tuple,struct}_field[12345]_finish`, equivalent to a
  `Formatter::debug_{tuple,struct}` + N x `Debug{Tuple,Struct}::field` +
  `Debug{Tuple,Struct}::finish` call sequence.
- `Formatter::debug_{tuple,struct}_fields_finish` is similar, but can
  handle any number of fields by using arrays.

These new methods are all marked as `doc(hidden)` and unstable. They are
intended for the compiler's own use.

Special-casing up to 5 fields gives significantly better performance
results than always using arrays (as was tried in rust-lang#95637).

The commit also changes the `Debug` deriving code to use these new methods. For
example, where the old `Debug` code for a struct with two fields would be like
this:
```
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut ::core::fmt::Formatter) -> ::core::fmt::Result {
    match *self {
	Self {
	    f1: ref __self_0_0,
	    f2: ref __self_0_1,
	} => {
	    let debug_trait_builder = &mut ::core::fmt::Formatter::debug_struct(f, "S2");
	    let _ = ::core::fmt::DebugStruct::field(debug_trait_builder, "f1", &&(*__self_0_0));
	    let _ = ::core::fmt::DebugStruct::field(debug_trait_builder, "f2", &&(*__self_0_1));
	    ::core::fmt::DebugStruct::finish(debug_trait_builder)
	}
    }
}
```
the new code is like this:
```
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut ::core::fmt::Formatter) -> ::core::fmt::Result {
    match *self {
	Self {
	    f1: ref __self_0_0,
	    f2: ref __self_0_1,
	} => ::core::fmt::Formatter::debug_struct_field2_finish(
	    f,
	    "S2",
	    "f1",
	    &&(*__self_0_0),
	    "f2",
	    &&(*__self_0_1),
	),
    }
}
```
This shrinks the code produced for `Debug` instances
considerably, reducing compile times and binary sizes.

Co-authored-by: Scott McMurray <scottmcm@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants