Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

to_digit tweak #96124

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2022
Merged

to_digit tweak #96124

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2022

Conversation

gilescope
Copy link
Contributor

No need to check the assert all the time.

(Checked the TODO and it's not time to get rid of it yet)

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 16, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with r? rust-lang/libs-api @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to request review from a libs-api team reviewer. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @thomcc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 16, 2022
@gilescope
Copy link
Contributor Author

(I did this a while ago but then managed to undo it when I did some other optimisations to the function)

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Apr 16, 2022

I'd be surprised if it matters much but seems fine to me.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 16, 2022

📌 Commit bf02d1e has been approved by thomcc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 16, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2022
to_digit tweak

No need to check the assert all the time.

(Checked the TODO and it's not time to get rid of it yet)
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95346 (Stablize `const_extern_fn` for "Rust" and "C")
 - rust-lang#95933 (htmldocck: Compare HTML tree instead of plain text html)
 - rust-lang#96105 (Make the debug output for `TargetSelection` less verbose)
 - rust-lang#96112 (Strict provenance lint diagnostics improvements)
 - rust-lang#96119 (update Miri)
 - rust-lang#96124 (to_digit tweak)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b47265e into rust-lang:master Apr 17, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants