Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use futex locks on emscripten. #96205

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 20, 2022
Merged

Conversation

m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

@m-ou-se m-ou-se commented Apr 19, 2022

This switches Emscripten to the futex-based lock implementations, away from pthread.

Tracking issue: #93740

@m-ou-se m-ou-se added A-concurrency Area: Concurrency O-asmjs Target: asm.js - http://asmjs.org/ T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 19, 2022
@rust-highfive

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @thomcc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 19, 2022
Copy link
Member

@thomcc thomcc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I guess these do still function on the main thread in browsers, and just busy loop (according to https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/pthreads.html). Good to know.

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Apr 19, 2022

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2022

📌 Commit 06a8f05 has been approved by thomcc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 19, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2022
…homcc

Use futex locks on emscripten.

This switches Emscripten to the futex-based lock implementations, away from pthread.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#93740
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95740 (asm: Add a kreg0 register class on x86 which includes k0)
 - rust-lang#95813 (Remove extra space before a where clause)
 - rust-lang#96029 (Refactor loop into iterator; simplify negation logic.)
 - rust-lang#96162 (interpret: Fix writing uninit to an allocation)
 - rust-lang#96165 (Miri provenance cleanup)
 - rust-lang#96205 (Use futex locks on emscripten.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit da1ddf3 into rust-lang:master Apr 20, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 20, 2022
@m-ou-se m-ou-se deleted the emscripten-futex-locks branch April 20, 2022 04:27
@workingjubilee workingjubilee added the O-emscripten Target: 50% off wasm32-unknown-musl. the savings come out of stdio.h, but hey, you get SDL! label Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-concurrency Area: Concurrency O-asmjs Target: asm.js - http://asmjs.org/ O-emscripten Target: 50% off wasm32-unknown-musl. the savings come out of stdio.h, but hey, you get SDL! S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants