Skip to content

Conversation

marmeladema
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #96157

r? @jackh726

Built on top of #96385 so only the second commit is relevant

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 25, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 25, 2022
| hir::Node::TraitItem(&hir::TraitItem { ref generics, .. })
| hir::Node::ImplItem(&hir::ImplItem { ref generics, .. }) => generics,
_ => return,
pub fn suggest_adding_lifetime_params<'tcx>(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Method moved as a free standing function

self.suggest_adding_lifetime_params(sub, ty_sup, ty_sub, &mut err);
if suggest_adding_lifetime_params(self.tcx(), sub, ty_sup, ty_sub, &mut err) {
err.note("each elided lifetime in input position becomes a distinct lifetime");
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note was originally in suggest_adding_lifetime_params but by moving it here we can avoid having the note under NLL.
However if we do want the note, I can just move it back to where it comes from

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm. The note is kind of redundant with the NLL error output, I guess.

Copy link
Member

@jackh726 jackh726 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some nits but overall LGTM

self.suggest_adding_lifetime_params(sub, ty_sup, ty_sub, &mut err);
if suggest_adding_lifetime_params(self.tcx(), sub, ty_sup, ty_sub, &mut err) {
err.note("each elided lifetime in input position becomes a distinct lifetime");
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm. The note is kind of redundant with the NLL error output, I guess.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #96459) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@marmeladema marmeladema force-pushed the fix-nll-introduce-named-lifetime-suggestion branch from cee7629 to 2c94218 Compare April 27, 2022 20:36
@jackh726
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 28, 2022

📌 Commit 2c94218 has been approved by jackh726

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 28, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2022
…-lifetime-suggestion, r=jackh726

Recover suggestions to introduce named lifetime under NLL

Fixes rust-lang#96157

r? `@jackh726`

Built on top of rust-lang#96385 so only the second commit is relevant
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2022
…-lifetime-suggestion, r=jackh726

Recover suggestions to introduce named lifetime under NLL

Fixes rust-lang#96157

r? ``@jackh726``

Built on top of rust-lang#96385 so only the second commit is relevant
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95312 (Ensure that `'_` and GAT yields errors)
 - rust-lang#96405 (Migrate ambiguous plus diagnostic to the new derive macro)
 - rust-lang#96409 (Recover suggestions to introduce named lifetime under NLL)
 - rust-lang#96433 (rustc_ast: Harmonize delimiter naming with `proc_macro::Delimiter`)
 - rust-lang#96480 (Fixed grammatical error in example comment)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit cbfbc3b into rust-lang:master Apr 28, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 28, 2022
@marmeladema marmeladema deleted the fix-nll-introduce-named-lifetime-suggestion branch April 28, 2022 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[NLL] Loss of suggestion to introduce a named lifetime parameter
5 participants