Fix jump to def regression #96636
Merged
Fix jump to def regression #96636
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GuillaumeGomez
added
the
T-rustdoc
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This was referenced May 2, 2022
notriddle
reviewed
May 6, 2022
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
fix-jump-to-def-regression
branch
from
6b1fe8d to
3bfa2eb
Compare
|
I completely removed the function. I extended the test a bit too. |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 3bfa2eb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2022
…ession, r=notriddle Fix jump to def regression rust-lang#93803 introduced a regression in the "jump to def" feature. This fixes it. Nice side-effect: it adds a new regression test. :) I also used this opportunity to add documentation about this unstable feature in the rustdoc book. cc `@cjgillot` r? `@notriddle`
|
perhaps caused #96792 to fail? I think that was the only rustdoc related PR in the rollup. |
|
No, it's not this one as it doesn't change anything in rustdoc behaviour. I'll take a look at what went wrong. |
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2022
…ession, r=notriddle Fix jump to def regression rust-lang#93803 introduced a regression in the "jump to def" feature. This fixes it. Nice side-effect: it adds a new regression test. :) I also used this opportunity to add documentation about this unstable feature in the rustdoc book. cc `@cjgillot` r? `@notriddle`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2022
…laumeGomez Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#96581 (make Size and Align debug-printing a bit more compact) - rust-lang#96636 (Fix jump to def regression) - rust-lang#96760 (diagnostics: port more diagnostics to derive + add support for `Vec` fields) - rust-lang#96788 (Improve validator around field projections and checked bin ops) - rust-lang#96805 (Change eslint rules from configuration comments to configuration file) - rust-lang#96807 (update Miri) - rust-lang#96811 (Fix a minor typo in the description of Formatter) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#93803 introduced a regression in the "jump to def" feature. This fixes it.
Nice side-effect: it adds a new regression test. :)
I also used this opportunity to add documentation about this unstable feature in the rustdoc book.
Part of #89095.
cc @cjgillot
r? @notriddle