-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 8 pull requests #96653
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #96653
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This makes the "remove extra arguement" suggestion valid when the function argument is a macro
…env candidates for Sized predicates
* Improve code. * Fix some documentation argument types. * Make settings order the same as before this PR. * Change timeout to 0 so that browser will render it as fast as possible.
The bool's meaning wasn't obvious to me at some call sites.
There's some subtle interaction between inferred expressions being passed as an argument to fn calls with fewer than expected arguments. To avoid the ICE, I'm changing indexing operations with `.get(idx)`, but the underlying logic still needs to be audited as it was written with the assumption that `final_arg_types` and `provided_args` have the right length. Address 96638.
Switch settings menu to full js Since the settings can only be set when the JS is enabled, it's not really a problem. It also fixes a debate we had around the themes not being accessible easily before. ![Screenshot from 2022-01-19 23-06-59](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/150221936-fd1a1e76-06b6-4416-a653-dbae111979ed.png) You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/settings-js/doc/foo/index.html). r? `@jsha`
…rister Remove `ignore` from E0705 test Spotted this, and I think this can be made to test now.
…chaelwoerister Refactor the WriteBackendMethods and ExtraBackendMethods traits The new interface is slightly less confusing and is easier to implement for non-LLVM backends.
…erister Use source callsite in check_argument_types suggestion This makes the "remove extra arguement" suggestion valid when the function argument is a macro. Additionally, this may fix rust-lang#96225, but the only way I can reproduce that issue is using the playground, so we will need to wait until after this is merged to ensure it's fixed.
…rors Revert "Prefer projection candidates instead of param_env candidates for Sized predicates" Fixes rust-lang#93262 Reopens rust-lang#89352 This was a hack that seemed to have no negative side-effects at the time. Given that the latter has a workaround and likely less common than the former, it makes sense to revert this change. r? `@compiler-errors`
Add a regression test for rust-lang#92305 Closes rust-lang#92305 r? `@oli-obk` as per rust-lang#92305 (comment)
Use a yes/no enum instead of a bool. The bool's meaning wasn't obvious to me at some call sites.
Mitigate impact of subtle invalid call suggestion logic There's some subtle interaction between inferred expressions being passed as an argument to fn calls with fewer than expected arguments. To avoid the ICE, I'm changing indexing operations with `.get(idx)`, but the underlying logic still needs to be audited as it was written with the assumption that `final_arg_types` and `provided_args` have the right length. Address rust-lang#96638.
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
May 2, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=8 |
📌 Commit ed7ce52 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
May 2, 2022
⌛ Testing commit ed7ce52 with merge 4e243b1f233509c1f52ac23a2621cc8673444181... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
May 3, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
ignore
from E0705 test #96580 (Removeignore
from E0705 test)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup