Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #97766

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

GuillaumeGomez and others added 13 commits May 31, 2022 14:02
…=jsha

Add empty impl blocks if they have documentation

Fixes rust-lang#90866.

The update for the test script is needed to count the number of impl blocks we have with only the struct. To be noted that with rust-lang#89676 merged, it wouldn't be needed (I don't know what is the status of it btw. cc `@Mark-Simulacrum).`

It looks like this:

![Screenshot from 2021-11-14 16-51-28](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/141689100-e57123c0-bf50-4c42-adf5-d991e169a0e4.png)

cc `@jyn514`
r? `@camelid`
Fail gracefully when encountering an HRTB in APIT.

Fixes rust-lang#96954

~The first commit will be merged as part of rust-lang#97415
typo: `-Zcodegen-backend=llvm -Cpasses=list` should work now

r? `@bjorn3`
use strict provenance APIs

The stdlib was adjusted to avoid bare int2ptr casts, but recently some casts of that sort have sneaked back in. Let's fix that. :)
…crum

Restore a test that was intended to test `as` cast to ptr

This test was changed in rust-lang#61864, but the original bug rust-lang#46365 was about casts so I doubt the changed test still even tests what this was intended to test. Let's restore the original test.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 5, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2022

📌 Commit f6f8977 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 5, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2022

⌛ Testing commit f6f8977 with merge 94665e90d6b9c96600bba6eb956271520a157111...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2022

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 6, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC closed this Jun 6, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-j7a5op0 branch July 30, 2022 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants