Try out yeet in the MIR interpreter

[scottmcm]

Since we got a new bootstrap, we can give this a shot.

r? @oli-obk

[rust-highfive]

Some changes occured to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

[RalfJung]

LGTM. :)
@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit a6c6fa0 has been approved by RalfJung

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit a6c6fa0 with merge 546c826...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: RalfJung
Pushing 546c826 to master...

[rust-highfive]

📣 Toolstate changed by #98018!

Tested on commit 546c826.
Direct link to PR: #98018

💔 miri on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).
💔 miri on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (546c826): comparison url.

Instruction count

• Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
• Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found

	mean1	max	count2
Regressions 😿 (primary)	1.1%	1.1%	1
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-0.6%	-0.6%	1
All 😿🎉 (primary)	1.1%	1.1%	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

• Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
• Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found

	mean1	max	count2
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	2.9%	2.9%	1
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	N/A	N/A	0
All 😿🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩²

2. number of relevant changes ↩ ↩²