-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix box with custom allocator in miri #98554
Merged
bors
merged 4 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
beepster4096:box_unsizing_is_not_special
Jun 29, 2022
Merged
Fix box with custom allocator in miri #98554
bors
merged 4 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
beepster4096:box_unsizing_is_not_special
Jun 29, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Jun 26, 2022
Some changes occured to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 26, 2022
RalfJung
reviewed
Jun 26, 2022
r? @RalfJung |
Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
RalfJung
reviewed
Jun 28, 2022
you should always run x.py check before pushing
Looking good, very nice. :) |
📌 Commit 9039265 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 28, 2022
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2022
…ial, r=RalfJung Fix box with custom allocator in miri This should fix the failures in rust-lang/miri#2072 and rust-lang#98510. cc `@RalfJung`
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2022
…ial, r=RalfJung Fix box with custom allocator in miri This should fix the failures in rust-lang/miri#2072 and rust-lang#98510. cc ``@RalfJung``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98415 (Migrate some `rustc_borrowck` diagnostics to `SessionDiagnostic`) - rust-lang#98479 (Add `fetch_not` method on `AtomicBool`) - rust-lang#98499 (Erase regions in New Abstract Consts) - rust-lang#98516 (library: fix uefi va_list type definition) - rust-lang#98554 (Fix box with custom allocator in miri) - rust-lang#98607 (Clean up arg mismatch diagnostic, generalize tuple wrap suggestion) - rust-lang#98625 (emit Retag for compound types with reference fields) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2022
fix interpreter validity check on Box Follow-up to rust-lang#98554: avoid walking over parts of the value twice. And then move all that logic into the general visitor so not each visitor implementation has to deal with it...
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2022
fix interpreter validity check on Box Follow-up to rust-lang#98554: avoid walking over parts of the value twice. And then move all that logic into the general visitor so not each visitor implementation has to deal with it...
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2022
fix interpreter validity check on Box Follow-up to rust-lang#98554: avoid walking over parts of the value twice. And then move all that logic into the general visitor so not each visitor implementation has to deal with it...
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2022
fix interpreter validity check on Box Follow-up to rust-lang#98554: avoid walking over parts of the value twice. And then move all that logic into the general visitor so not each visitor implementation has to deal with it...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should fix the failures in rust-lang/miri#2072 and #98510.
cc @RalfJung