Skip to content

Revert #558. Fixes #603. #604

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor

Revert "do not validate the argument to the __breakpoint intrinsic", "aarch64 support and range validation", "fix typo", "fix assert_instr test", "remove TODO; add link to doc comment", "add __breakpoint"

This reverts commits 7fbd636, 72b4143, 9e5c960, 8b84dc4, af7c166, 40f61c7.

Revert "do not validate the argument to the __breakpoint intrinsic", "aarch64 support and range validation", "fix typo", "fix assert_instr test", "remove TODO; add link to doc comment", "add __breakpoint"

This reverts commits 7fbd636, 72b4143, 9e5c960, 8b84dc4, af7c166, 40f61c7.
@jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor Author

i586/i686 tests also fail on master: https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang-nursery/stdsimd/builds/460124295

@gnzlbg
Copy link
Contributor

gnzlbg commented Nov 27, 2018

We should fix this, not revert it. The question is: why does this break on rust-lang/rust but works fine here ?

@gnzlbg
Copy link
Contributor

gnzlbg commented Nov 27, 2018

IIRC the problem was that the constify! macro was not found on armclang, but the macros module is always included at the top of the library, and that happens before armclang is included.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Agreed yeah, would it be possible to get a gist of the error logs to see if we can fix it without reverting?

@jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor Author

See #603

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

That's fixed in #609

@gnzlbg
Copy link
Contributor

gnzlbg commented Nov 29, 2018

So I'm closing this, since it should be now fixed on master.

@gnzlbg gnzlbg closed this Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants