Skip to content

Conversation

apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

@apiraino apiraino commented Oct 2, 2025

Beta backport nominations were confusing so we decided to turn them into suggestions for reviewers and author of a PR fixing a regression. The idea is to raise awareness on patches fixing P-high/P-critical regressions but at the same time not make it look like a mandatory decision for T-compiler to take.

After this patch, I will modify the template that creates Zulip topics for backport nominations. For example it could look like this:

PR #123456 "Fix insulation in flux capacitor" fixes a regression.
Cc: @user1, @user2, @user3 please evaluate nominating this PR for backport, thanks!
The following poll is a vibe-check and not binding.

/poll Should #123456 be beta backported?
approve
decline
don't know
(visual representation)

grafik

(@user1, @user2, @user3) are PR author and reviewers.

As per Zulip discussion.

@apiraino apiraino force-pushed the change-backport-nominations branch from f4c2231 to c347fd8 Compare October 6, 2025 15:27
Comment on lines +220 to +223
// Issue/PR authors/reviewers will receive a mention if the template has `{recipients}`.
let recipients = &mut event.issue.assignees.clone();
recipients.push(event.issue.user.clone());

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is different from before: if the template has a {recipients} placeholder, author and reviewers of the PR/issue will receive a mention.

(this change is very specific to my use-case but I think it can be used in other contexts)

Ok(())
}

async fn get_zulip_ids(ctx: &Context, recipients: &[User]) -> String {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this code here is duplicating what we have in src/zulip.rs so a better way would be to refactor that module and expose functions. Maybe another time.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to generate the mention it's using the trick to write @|12345 where 12345 is the Zulip ID of the user.

@apiraino apiraino marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2025 15:51
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Oct 7, 2025

Let me know if you want a review.

@apiraino apiraino requested a review from Kobzol October 7, 2025 07:17
@apiraino apiraino force-pushed the change-backport-nominations branch from c347fd8 to 63ae02e Compare October 7, 2025 16:01
@apiraino apiraino requested a review from Kobzol October 7, 2025 16:14
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, let's try.

View changes since this review

@Kobzol Kobzol added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit d16ca50 Oct 7, 2025
3 checks passed
@apiraino apiraino deleted the change-backport-nominations branch October 7, 2025 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants