-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove blas from linfa clustering #257
Remove blas from linfa clustering #257
Conversation
Should blas testing also be removed from CI for linfa-clustering? |
Codecov ReportBase: 39.17% // Head: 39.24% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #257 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 39.17% 39.24% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 92 92
Lines 6096 6092 -4
==========================================
+ Hits 2388 2391 +3
+ Misses 3708 3701 -7
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
You need to update the README as well. Also remove |
done @YuhanLiin |
@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ Implementation choices, algorithmic details and a tutorial can be found | |||
**WARNING:** Currently the Approximated DBSCAN implementation is slower than the normal DBSCAN implementation. Therefore DBSCAN should always be used over Approximated DBSCAN. | |||
|
|||
## BLAS/Lapack backend | |||
|
|||
See [this section](../../README.md#blaslapack-backend) to enable an external BLAS/LAPACK backend. | |||
We found that the pure Rust implementation maintained similar performance to the BLAS/LAPACK version. Thus, to reduce code complexity BLAS support has been removed for this module. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mention this PR here as well
Attempt to remove blas support from linfa-clustering per #255