Skip to content

Fix comparison with NumPy of slicing with negative step #1319

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2023
Merged

Fix comparison with NumPy of slicing with negative step #1319

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/doc/ndarray_for_numpy_users/mod.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
//! When slicing in `ndarray`, the axis is first sliced with `start..end`. Then if
//! `step` is positive, the first index is the front of the slice; if `step` is
//! negative, the first index is the back of the slice. This means that the
//! behavior is the same as NumPy except when `step < -1`. See the docs for the
//! behavior is different from NumPy when `step < 0`. See the docs for the
//! [`s![]` macro][s!] for more details.
//!
//! </td>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -246,8 +246,8 @@
//! methods [`.slice_mut()`][.slice_mut()], [`.slice_move()`][.slice_move()], and
//! [`.slice_collapse()`][.slice_collapse()].
//!
//! * The behavior of slicing is slightly different from NumPy for slices with
//! `step < -1`. See the docs for the [`s![]` macro][s!] for more details.
//! * The behavior of slicing is different from NumPy for slices with
//! `step < 0`. See the docs for the [`s![]` macro][s!] for more details.
//!
//! NumPy | `ndarray` | Notes
//! ------|-----------|------
Expand Down