Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor and simplify BLAS gemm call further #1421

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

Refactor and simplify BLAS gemm call further #1421

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

bluss
Copy link
Member

@bluss bluss commented Aug 9, 2024

As a follow-up to #1419, we could simplify and clean up
how BLAS gemm is called even further.

bluss added 3 commits August 9, 2024 21:46
Use git's tformat to get a newline on the last entry, and
then we include the last commit hash in the listing too.
It separates feature selection for different dependency classes (dev,
build, regular), which makes sense even if it seems to have no impact at
the moment.
@bluss bluss added the blas label Aug 9, 2024
@bluss bluss added this to the 0.16.x milestone Aug 9, 2024
bluss added 3 commits August 9, 2024 21:53
Further clarify transpose logic by putting it into BlasOrder methods.
Implement a checkerboard pattern in input data just to test with some
another kind of input.
@bluss bluss changed the title blas: Refactor and simplify gemm call further Refactor and simplify BLAS gemm call further Aug 9, 2024
@bluss bluss merged commit 33e2a58 into master Aug 14, 2024
12 checks passed
@bluss bluss deleted the blas-simplify branch August 14, 2024 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant