Fixed bug stemming from treating an exclusive range as an inclusive r… #362
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merged
phil-opp
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
The `zero_end` bound is exclusive, but we treat the `end_page` as inclusive. So when `zero_end` is page-aligned, we allocate one additional bss page. If this page was already mapped to some other segment, we remap it to a page with random content. This is the same bug as #362.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should fix a rare bug regarding treating an exclusive range as an inclusive range when the zero_end is page aligned.