Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vhost_user: Add support for SHMEM_MAP/UNMAP backend requests #251
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
vhost_user: Add support for SHMEM_MAP/UNMAP backend requests #251
Changes from 2 commits
fe8b6f5
43707ca
d0220a8
bf692de
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think it's better to remove the negation (!) and use a direct check to return meaningful values. e.g
if self.shmem_mappings.insert(req.shm_offset, req.len) { Ok(1) } else { Ok(0) }
and why the double braces? missing &?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By braces do you mean
( )
or{ }
? The(req.shm_offset, req.len)
is a tuple.In regards to the negation with cast instead of explicit
if
, I considered to write it like you did, I mainly wrote it like this, because it is symmetric with the existingshared_object_add
,shared_object_remove
above:I am not sure if I should change it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah right!
doesn't necessarily mean it's the correct approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you want to add more checks relevant to the struct? e.g a check based on valid values for
shmid
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From virtio spec:
According to the
virtio
(not vhost) spec the valid values ofshmid
are dependent on the device type (And probably the advertised device features...), so I don't think you could check it here generally.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, fair enough for
shmid
, you can leave it as it is.