Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update raw-window-handle to 0.2 #1191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2019

Conversation

msiglreith
Copy link
Member

  • Tested on all platforms changed
  • Compilation warnings were addressed
  • cargo fmt has been run on this branch
  • Added an entry to CHANGELOG.md if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users
  • Updated documentation to reflect any user-facing changes, including notes of platform-specific behavior
  • Created or updated an example program if it would help users understand this functionality
  • Updated feature matrix, if new features were added or implemented

@msiglreith msiglreith force-pushed the raw-window-handle-0.2 branch from b394dc7 to ac835a2 Compare September 27, 2019 22:23
@rukai rukai mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2019
@ryanisaacg ryanisaacg merged commit 18a0119 into rust-windowing:master Sep 30, 2019
@msiglreith msiglreith deleted the raw-window-handle-0.2 branch September 30, 2019 21:59
bors bot added a commit to gfx-rs/wgpu that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2019
344: Update deps r=kvark a=rukai

We should wait for rust-windowing/winit#1191 to find its way into a winit release before merging this PR.

Co-authored-by: Rukai <rubickent@gmail.com>
hecrj added a commit to hecrj/winit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2019
kvark pushed a commit to gfx-rs/wgpu-native that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2020
344: Update deps r=kvark a=rukai

We should wait for rust-windowing/winit#1191 to find its way into a winit release before merging this PR.

Co-authored-by: Rukai <rubickent@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants