-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
[auto-pr] #174: [Coding Guideline]: Defect Guideline for CERT C, INT34-C: Do not shift an expression by a negative number of bits or by greater than or equal to the number of bits that exist in the operand #181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for scrc-coding-guidelines ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
@felix91gr -- could you add the new tag you're using in another PR? Note that this fails for the same reason as over in #180, so if you addressed the tags over there, you're good. |
805f1b5 to
f201f93
Compare
f201f93 to
98c3447
Compare
98c3447 to
90a32a9
Compare
90a32a9 to
9fe7d0d
Compare
|
There are a few things regarding the formatting that I can't quite figure out. @PLeVasseur who from the core team knows the most about Sphinx? There are a few oddities in rendering that I've noticed as I've seen the document change with the PRs, of which I can't pinpoint the cause. Stuff like some bulleted lists having a lot of spacing between their bullet and their text, to some text of the document being obscured by the page's background. So I was thinking that perhaps I could ask for help in finding the causes of those. |
|
(Also I'm doing the tables by hand, as you suggested :) took me a while to get to it, but I'm on it) |
|
Also: I just fixed a typo because CI rejected the PR due to some unrelated document having a typo. Should this be on another PR? Anywho. I'll be fixing the table on the other open PR, you tell me how we should merge the typo fix and then we can finally merge both guidelines x3 |
41a9b1d to
9fe7d0d
Compare
|
Nevermind. I'll just fix that in another PR. Otherwise iterating on this one will be a pain. |
9fe7d0d to
5bfd353
Compare
|
#206 has the typo fix |
e94e531 to
7380725
Compare
PLeVasseur
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to see this working with the manual table.
Content-wise this is good.
There's a couple of formatting snags I pointed out.
|
Well that's new 😅 Pulled from here. |
5360617 to
50f5101
Compare
|
I added some whitespace to the commit message @PLeVasseur, which re-triggered the Netlify deploy. However, it still errors out. So whatever is broken over there, must still be broken 🤔 |
|
Opened #212 to track to resolution so that we can get this build to pass. |
|
@felix91gr -- please rebase and push. Build should work now |
50f5101 to
e97b5f5
Compare
|
@PLeVasseur I just did. For some reason, Netlify is still trying to build it with Python 3.14 🤔 |
|
Okay, I put #180 onto the merge queue. I think this one need only be rebased, right? |
e97b5f5 to
505fc4a
Compare
Co-authored-by: felix91gr <felix91gr@users.noreply.github.com> Note: tables were written by hand due to limitations in our automation
505fc4a to
9382fa4
Compare
|
@PLeVasseur it should be ready now :) |
PLeVasseur
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Co-authored-by: felix91gr <felix91gr@users.noreply.github.com> Note: tables were written by hand due to limitations in our automation Co-authored-by: felix91gr <11747623+felix91gr@users.noreply.github.com>

This PR was automatically generated from issue #174.
Authored by: @felix91gr
Closes #174.