Don't use u8x16_bitmask for ASCII Check
#79
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hkratz
reviewed
Mar 29, 2023
Because `NEON` doesn't have an equivalent instruction, the WASM runtimes have to emit fairly suboptimal instructions for bitmasks. Therefore it's best to avoid it, if the code can be written in an alternative way.
CryZe
force-pushed
the
no-bitmask-on-wasm
branch
from
a174d65 to
e38f9f0
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Because
NEONdoesn't have an equivalent instruction, the WASM runtimes have to emit fairly suboptimal instructions for bitmasks. Therefore it's best to avoid it, if the code can be written in an alternative way.