Skip to content

Conversation

@djc
Copy link
Member

@djc djc commented Jan 4, 2026

I think cache_dir should actually be in the top-level Config, since it is upki-wide (that is, not just limited to revocation in the future). Includes a bunch of further librarification to make this a bit nicer.

@djc djc requested a review from ctz January 4, 2026 21:29
@djc djc force-pushed the revocation-cache branch 2 times, most recently from 545f530 to 8662a71 Compare January 4, 2026 21:43
@djc djc force-pushed the revocation-cache branch from 8662a71 to 2448a9b Compare January 5, 2026 10:10
@djc djc changed the title More librarification Move revocation cache Jan 5, 2026
pub(super) async fn fetch(dry_run: bool, config: &Config) -> Result<ExitCode, Report> {
use crate::{Config, Filter, Manifest};

pub async fn fetch(dry_run: bool, config: &Config) -> Result<ExitCode, Report> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we missing a lint here for undocumented pub items?

@ctz
Copy link
Member

ctz commented Jan 5, 2026

I think it's more constructive to merge this before #29?

@djc djc added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 5, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 57bee8e Jan 5, 2026
7 checks passed
@djc djc deleted the revocation-cache branch January 5, 2026 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants