Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stdweb is unmaintained/abandoned #391

Closed
jhpratt opened this issue Aug 31, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #439
Closed

stdweb is unmaintained/abandoned #391

jhpratt opened this issue Aug 31, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by #439

Comments

@jhpratt
Copy link
Contributor

jhpratt commented Aug 31, 2020

See koute/stdweb#403, which has been open just shy of four months.

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

tarcieri commented Sep 1, 2020

Are there any alternatives to recommend? A maintained fork?

@jhpratt
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhpratt commented Sep 1, 2020

Not that I'm aware of.

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

Note: this should probably be filed against the Advisory DB repo: https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db

@jhpratt
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhpratt commented Sep 22, 2020

Are you able to move the issue? I don't recall if that feature is still in beta or not.

@tarcieri tarcieri transferred this issue from rustsec/rustsec Sep 22, 2020
@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

It worked!

@strohel
Copy link

strohel commented Oct 23, 2020

@tarcieri and for reference: maintained alternative to stdweb mostly is wasm-bindgen + js-sys + web-sys: https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen

(per https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/e7trlf/question_whats_the_difference_between_stdweb_and/fa6lslj?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 and my own observations)

flosse added a commit to flosse/rust-web-framework-comparison that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2020
tarcieri added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2020
tarcieri added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2020
@RalfJung
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW this crate also has open soundness issues. Not sure if that would change anything about the advisory though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants