Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency filelock to v3.15.4 #1967

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
filelock ==3.15.3 -> ==3.15.4 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

tox-dev/py-filelock (filelock)

v3.15.4

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: tox-dev/filelock@3.15.3...3.15.4


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled because a matching PR was automerged previously.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tip

Early access features
  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for reviews and chat.

Note:

  • You can disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by setting early_access: false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are always opted into early access features.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 82d79a8..f11654c. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change made in the diff seems to be solely an update of the 'filelock' library from version 3.15.3 to 3.15.4. It is generally a good practice to keep libraries up-to-date to benefit from possible bug fixes, improvements and new features. However, changes in library versions can potentially break code compatibility, so the application should be thoroughly tested after this update.

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows"
coverage==7.5.3
distlib==0.3.8
filelock==3.15.3
filelock==3.15.4
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The version of 'filelock' library has been updated from '3.15.3' to '3.15.4'. Please ensure that this update doesn't break the application by thoroughly testing it.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commit seems to update the filelock library from version 3.15.3 to 3.15.4. The changes are relatively minor and there are no significant concerns identified. However, the reasons for upgrading the package are not provided. Also, it is not known whether essential tests have been run after the package upgrade to ensure that the newer package does not break any existing functionality.

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows"
coverage==7.5.3
distlib==0.3.8
filelock==3.15.3
filelock==3.15.4
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line shows the package version upgrade for filelock. Please clarify the reasons for this particular upgrade - have there been essential changes or bug fixes in the newer version that we need? Also, make sure to run integration tests to ensure that the upgrade does not cause any unforeseen issues or conflicts with our current codebase.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change seems straightforward, updating the version of the filelock package in the requirements.txt file. However, package version updates can potentially introduce breaking changes, so ensure that this update is fully compatible with the rest of the code base.

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows"
coverage==7.5.3
distlib==0.3.8
filelock==3.15.3
filelock==3.15.4
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The filelock package was updated from version 3.15.3 to version 3.15.4. Check the change logs of the package for this new version to ensure no breaking changes were introduced which could adversely affect the code base.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only change in this Git diff is an update of the filelock dependency from version 3.15.3 to 3.15.4. Generally, updates in minor versions (3.15.x to 3.15.x+1) should not cause any issues and are expected to include non-breaking patches and fixes. However, it is still important to ensure that this version bump is necessary, compliant with other dependencies, and doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior. Additionally, make sure to run tests after this change to ensure everything still works as anticipated.

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows"
coverage==7.5.3
distlib==0.3.8
filelock==3.15.3
filelock==3.15.4
Copy link

@codecov codecov bot Jun 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updating filelock from version 3.15.3 to 3.15.4. Kindly ensure this version update is essential for the functioning of the software. Make sure to run compatibility tests with this newer version to prevent potential bugs or crashes in the software.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 9.74%. Comparing base (82d79a8) to head (f11654c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1967   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   9.74%   9.74%           
=====================================
  Files        133     133           
  Lines       9730    9730           
  Branches     161     151   -10     
=====================================
  Hits         948     948           
  Misses      8782    8782           
Flag Coverage Δ
cli 0.00% <ø> (ø)
connection 25.66% <ø> (ø)
database 9.70% <ø> (ø)
gateway 41.48% <ø> (ø)
mcots 0.00% <ø> (ø)
nps 0.00% <ø> (ø)
patch 86.08% <ø> (ø)
schema 0.00% <ø> (ø)
shard 41.47% <ø> (ø)
shared 13.44% <ø> (ø)
shared-packets 0.00% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@drazisil drazisil enabled auto-merge June 29, 2024 11:43
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/filelock-3.x branch from 804603e to f11654c Compare June 29, 2024 15:12
Copy link

@drazisil drazisil added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 22b399a Jun 29, 2024
18 checks passed
@drazisil drazisil deleted the renovate/filelock-3.x branch June 29, 2024 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant