chore(ci): remove standard-version dependency

[drazisil]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Removed the standard-version dependency, simplifying the project's dependency list. This may require adjustments in versioning and changelog management.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of the dependency "standard-version": "^9.5.0" from the package.json file. This change simplifies the project's dependency list and indicates a shift away from using the standard-version package, which is commonly used for versioning and changelog generation based on conventional commits.

Changes

File	Change Summary
package.json	Removed the dependency "standard-version": "^9.5.0"

Possibly related PRs

• Remove unused dependencies from package.json and pnpm-lock.yaml #2151: The removal of dependencies from package.json in both PRs indicates a similar focus on simplifying the dependency list, which aligns with the main PR's change of removing "standard-version".

Suggested labels

size/S

Poem

🐰 In the garden where dependencies grow,
A little rabbit hops to and fro.
With "standard-version" now out of sight,
Simplicity shines, oh what a delight!
No more fuss with versioning woes,
Just a clean patch where the soft grass grows. 🌼

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 37a905a and 4594352.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (0 hunks)

Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)

• package.json

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[socket-security]

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/rimraf@6.0.1	environment, filesystem Transitive: shell	+13	3.3 MB	isaacs

🚮 Removed packages: npm/typescript@5.6.2

View full report↗︎

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 37a905a..4594352. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
JavaScript	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.97%. Comparing base (37a905a) to head (4594352).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #2152   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.97%   28.97%           
=======================================
  Files         224      224           
  Lines       12443    12443           
  Branches      468      493   +25     
=======================================
  Hits         3605     3605           
  Misses       8838     8838           

Flag	Coverage Δ
cli	53.92% <ø> (ø)
connection	22.42% <ø> (ø)
database	30.98% <ø> (ø)
gateway	23.06% <ø> (ø)
lobby	7.30% <ø> (ø)
login	6.65% <ø> (ø)
mcots	10.62% <ø> (ø)
nps	15.88% <ø> (ø)
patch	64.42% <ø> (ø)
persona	18.89% <ø> (ø)
sessions	91.98% <ø> (ø)
shard	46.07% <ø> (ø)
shared	20.87% <ø> (ø)
shared-packets	2.65% <ø> (ø)
transactions	60.56% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.