Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

common/bolt11: fix 32-bit compilation. #11

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rustyrussell
Copy link
Owner

Fixes d9fed06:

common/bolt11.c:868:31: error: format specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') but the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
                                           bech32_charset[type], field_len);
                                                                 ^~~~~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell rusty@rustcorp.com.au

Fixes d9fed06:

```
common/bolt11.c:868:31: error: format specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') but the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
                                           bech32_charset[type], field_len);
                                                                 ^~~~~~~~~
```

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
rustyrussell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2023
The existing description is incorrect. `createinvoice` doesn't actually
work when supplied with a custom-encoded bolt11 invoice without the
final 520 signature bits appended. If a users tries to do so, some of
their tagged fields will be incorrectly truncated.

`createinvoice` actually expects that the signatures are there, and it
simply ignores them.

See common/bolt11.c's bolt11_decode_nosig:

         /* BOLT #11:
          *
          * The data part of a Lightning invoice consists of multiple sections:
          *
          * 1. `timestamp`: seconds-since-1970 (35 bits, big-endian)
          * 1. zero or more tagged parts
          * 1. `signature`: Bitcoin-style signature of above (520 bits)
          */
         if (!pull_uint(&hu5, &data, &data_len, &b11->timestamp, 35))
                 return decode_fail(b11, fail, "Can't get 35-bit timestamp");

>        while (data_len > 520 / 5) {
                 const char *problem = NULL;
                 u64 type, data_length;
rustyrussell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2023
This will fix a crash that I caused on armv7
and by looking inside the coredump with gdb
(by adding an assert on n that must be
different from null) I get the following stacktrace

```
(gdb) bt
\#0  0x00000000 in ?? ()
\#1  0x0043a038 in send_backtrace (why=0xbe9e3600 "FATAL SIGNAL 11") at common/daemon.c:36
\#2  0x0043a0ec in crashdump (sig=11) at common/daemon.c:46
\#3  <signal handler called>
\#4  0x00406d04 in node_announcement (map=0x938ecc, nann_off=495146) at common/gossmap.c:586
\#5  0x00406fec in map_catchup (map=0x938ecc, num_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:643
\#6  0x004073a4 in load_gossip_store (map=0x938ecc, num_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:697
\#7  0x00408244 in gossmap_load (ctx=0x0, filename=0x4e16b8 "gossip_store", num_channel_updates_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:976
\#8  0x0041a548 in init (p=0x93831c, buf=0x9399d4 "\n\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":\"cln:init#25\",\"method\":\"init\",\"params\":{\"options\":{},\"configuration\":{\"lightning-dir\":\"/home/vincent/.lightning/testnet\",\"rpc-file\":\"lightning-rpc\",\"startup\":true,\"network\":\"te"..., config=0x939cdc) at plugins/topology.c:622
\#9  0x0041e5d0 in handle_init (cmd=0x938934, buf=0x9399d4 "\n\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":\"cln:init#25\",\"method\":\"init\",\"params\":{\"options\":{},\"configuration\":{\"lightning-dir\":\"/home/vincent/.lightning/testnet\",\"rpc-file\":\"lightning-rpc\",\"startup\":true,\"network\":\"te"..., params=0x939c8c)
    at plugins/libplugin.c:1208
\#10 0x0041fc04 in ld_command_handle (plugin=0x93831c, toks=0x939bec) at plugins/libplugin.c:1572
\#11 0x00420050 in ld_read_json_one (plugin=0x93831c) at plugins/libplugin.c:1667
\#12 0x004201bc in ld_read_json (conn=0x9391c4, plugin=0x93831c) at plugins/libplugin.c:1687
\#13 0x004cb82c in next_plan (conn=0x9391c4, plan=0x9391d8) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:59
\#14 0x004cc67c in do_plan (conn=0x9391c4, plan=0x9391d8, idle_on_epipe=false) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:407
\ElementsProject#15 0x004cc6dc in io_ready (conn=0x9391c4, pollflags=1) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:417
\ElementsProject#16 0x004cf8cc in io_loop (timers=0x9383c4, expired=0xbe9e3ce4) at ccan/ccan/io/poll.c:453
\ElementsProject#17 0x00420af4 in plugin_main (argv=0xbe9e3eb4, init=0x41a46c <init>, restartability=PLUGIN_STATIC, init_rpc=true, features=0x0, commands=0x6167e8 <commands>, num_commands=4, notif_subs=0x0, num_notif_subs=0, hook_subs=0x0, num_hook_subs=0, notif_topics=0x0, num_notif_topics=0) at plugins/libplugin.c:1891
\ElementsProject#18 0x0041a6f8 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbe9e3eb4) at plugins/topology.c:679
```

I do not know if this is a solution because I do not know
when I can parse a node announcement for a node that
it is not longer in the gossip map.

So, I hope this is just usefult for @rustyrussell

Changelog-Fixed: fixes `FATAL SIGNAL 11` on gossmap node announcement parsing.

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
rustyrussell added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
It's still deprecated: we need the description since

1. This information is useful for any validation we want to do, such as
   the HSM, or runes.
2. We want this information in listpays so we can tell what we actually paid.
3. In general, we should never sign commitments to things we don't have!

I expect to have this information about payments *whatever the frontend* is,
which is why we deprecated (and then removed) this unintended use.  The spec
is pretty clear on this:

BOLT #11:
```
A reader:
...
  - MUST check that the SHA2 256-bit hash in the `h` field exactly matches the hashed
  description.
```

However, neither BTCPayServer nor lnbits updated despite the long deprecation
period, so revert 2afe7a1.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
rustyrussell added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
It's still deprecated: we need the description since

1. This information is useful for any validation we want to do, such as
   the HSM, or runes.
2. We want this information in listpays so we can tell what we actually paid.
3. In general, we should never sign commitments to things we don't have!

I expect to have this information about payments *whatever the frontend* is,
which is why we deprecated (and then removed) this unintended use.  The spec
is pretty clear on this:

BOLT #11:
```
A reader:
...
  - MUST check that the SHA2 256-bit hash in the `h` field exactly matches the hashed
  description.
```

However, neither BTCPayServer nor lnbits updated despite the long deprecation
period, so revert 2afe7a1.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
rustyrussell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2023
pubkey_from_hexstr() was failing, which we didn't notice because we
weren't checking the return value. The problem was that we were passing
it a strlen that was half the actual length.

Relevant error:

  [libsecp256k1] illegal argument: !secp256k1_fe_is_zero(&ge->x)

  ==417723== ERROR: libFuzzer: deadly signal
    #7 0x7f5deaacc7fb in abort
    #8 0x51b0b0 in secp256k1_default_illegal_callback_fn secp256k1.c
    #9 0x51bd8e in secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize
    #10 0x4e235b in pubkey_to_der bitcoin/pubkey.c:29:7
    #11 0x4e2941 in pubkey_cmp bitcoin/pubkey.c:89:2
    #12 0x4e333d in bitcoin_redeem_2of2 bitcoin/script.c:144:6
    #13 0x4f1396 in run tests/fuzz/fuzz-close_tx.c:78:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant