forked from ElementsProject/lightning
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
common/bolt11: fix 32-bit compilation. #11
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes d9fed06: ``` common/bolt11.c:868:31: error: format specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') but the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat] bech32_charset[type], field_len); ^~~~~~~~~ ``` Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
rustyrussell
force-pushed
the
fix-32-bit-compilation
branch
from
January 30, 2023 04:30
9221f30
to
5aab070
Compare
rustyrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2023
The existing description is incorrect. `createinvoice` doesn't actually work when supplied with a custom-encoded bolt11 invoice without the final 520 signature bits appended. If a users tries to do so, some of their tagged fields will be incorrectly truncated. `createinvoice` actually expects that the signatures are there, and it simply ignores them. See common/bolt11.c's bolt11_decode_nosig: /* BOLT #11: * * The data part of a Lightning invoice consists of multiple sections: * * 1. `timestamp`: seconds-since-1970 (35 bits, big-endian) * 1. zero or more tagged parts * 1. `signature`: Bitcoin-style signature of above (520 bits) */ if (!pull_uint(&hu5, &data, &data_len, &b11->timestamp, 35)) return decode_fail(b11, fail, "Can't get 35-bit timestamp"); > while (data_len > 520 / 5) { const char *problem = NULL; u64 type, data_length;
rustyrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2023
This will fix a crash that I caused on armv7 and by looking inside the coredump with gdb (by adding an assert on n that must be different from null) I get the following stacktrace ``` (gdb) bt \#0 0x00000000 in ?? () \#1 0x0043a038 in send_backtrace (why=0xbe9e3600 "FATAL SIGNAL 11") at common/daemon.c:36 \#2 0x0043a0ec in crashdump (sig=11) at common/daemon.c:46 \#3 <signal handler called> \#4 0x00406d04 in node_announcement (map=0x938ecc, nann_off=495146) at common/gossmap.c:586 \#5 0x00406fec in map_catchup (map=0x938ecc, num_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:643 \#6 0x004073a4 in load_gossip_store (map=0x938ecc, num_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:697 \#7 0x00408244 in gossmap_load (ctx=0x0, filename=0x4e16b8 "gossip_store", num_channel_updates_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:976 \#8 0x0041a548 in init (p=0x93831c, buf=0x9399d4 "\n\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":\"cln:init#25\",\"method\":\"init\",\"params\":{\"options\":{},\"configuration\":{\"lightning-dir\":\"/home/vincent/.lightning/testnet\",\"rpc-file\":\"lightning-rpc\",\"startup\":true,\"network\":\"te"..., config=0x939cdc) at plugins/topology.c:622 \#9 0x0041e5d0 in handle_init (cmd=0x938934, buf=0x9399d4 "\n\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":\"cln:init#25\",\"method\":\"init\",\"params\":{\"options\":{},\"configuration\":{\"lightning-dir\":\"/home/vincent/.lightning/testnet\",\"rpc-file\":\"lightning-rpc\",\"startup\":true,\"network\":\"te"..., params=0x939c8c) at plugins/libplugin.c:1208 \#10 0x0041fc04 in ld_command_handle (plugin=0x93831c, toks=0x939bec) at plugins/libplugin.c:1572 \#11 0x00420050 in ld_read_json_one (plugin=0x93831c) at plugins/libplugin.c:1667 \#12 0x004201bc in ld_read_json (conn=0x9391c4, plugin=0x93831c) at plugins/libplugin.c:1687 \#13 0x004cb82c in next_plan (conn=0x9391c4, plan=0x9391d8) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:59 \#14 0x004cc67c in do_plan (conn=0x9391c4, plan=0x9391d8, idle_on_epipe=false) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:407 \ElementsProject#15 0x004cc6dc in io_ready (conn=0x9391c4, pollflags=1) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:417 \ElementsProject#16 0x004cf8cc in io_loop (timers=0x9383c4, expired=0xbe9e3ce4) at ccan/ccan/io/poll.c:453 \ElementsProject#17 0x00420af4 in plugin_main (argv=0xbe9e3eb4, init=0x41a46c <init>, restartability=PLUGIN_STATIC, init_rpc=true, features=0x0, commands=0x6167e8 <commands>, num_commands=4, notif_subs=0x0, num_notif_subs=0, hook_subs=0x0, num_hook_subs=0, notif_topics=0x0, num_notif_topics=0) at plugins/libplugin.c:1891 \ElementsProject#18 0x0041a6f8 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbe9e3eb4) at plugins/topology.c:679 ``` I do not know if this is a solution because I do not know when I can parse a node announcement for a node that it is not longer in the gossip map. So, I hope this is just usefult for @rustyrussell Changelog-Fixed: fixes `FATAL SIGNAL 11` on gossmap node announcement parsing. Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
rustyrussell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2023
It's still deprecated: we need the description since 1. This information is useful for any validation we want to do, such as the HSM, or runes. 2. We want this information in listpays so we can tell what we actually paid. 3. In general, we should never sign commitments to things we don't have! I expect to have this information about payments *whatever the frontend* is, which is why we deprecated (and then removed) this unintended use. The spec is pretty clear on this: BOLT #11: ``` A reader: ... - MUST check that the SHA2 256-bit hash in the `h` field exactly matches the hashed description. ``` However, neither BTCPayServer nor lnbits updated despite the long deprecation period, so revert 2afe7a1. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
rustyrussell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2023
It's still deprecated: we need the description since 1. This information is useful for any validation we want to do, such as the HSM, or runes. 2. We want this information in listpays so we can tell what we actually paid. 3. In general, we should never sign commitments to things we don't have! I expect to have this information about payments *whatever the frontend* is, which is why we deprecated (and then removed) this unintended use. The spec is pretty clear on this: BOLT #11: ``` A reader: ... - MUST check that the SHA2 256-bit hash in the `h` field exactly matches the hashed description. ``` However, neither BTCPayServer nor lnbits updated despite the long deprecation period, so revert 2afe7a1. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
rustyrussell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2023
pubkey_from_hexstr() was failing, which we didn't notice because we weren't checking the return value. The problem was that we were passing it a strlen that was half the actual length. Relevant error: [libsecp256k1] illegal argument: !secp256k1_fe_is_zero(&ge->x) ==417723== ERROR: libFuzzer: deadly signal #7 0x7f5deaacc7fb in abort #8 0x51b0b0 in secp256k1_default_illegal_callback_fn secp256k1.c #9 0x51bd8e in secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize #10 0x4e235b in pubkey_to_der bitcoin/pubkey.c:29:7 #11 0x4e2941 in pubkey_cmp bitcoin/pubkey.c:89:2 #12 0x4e333d in bitcoin_redeem_2of2 bitcoin/script.c:144:6 #13 0x4f1396 in run tests/fuzz/fuzz-close_tx.c:78:19
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes d9fed06:
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell rusty@rustcorp.com.au