Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(httpproxy): remove unused resolver handling code #34

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

ryanbekhen
Copy link
Owner

@ryanbekhen ryanbekhen commented Jan 23, 2025

Removed redundant destination resolution code from httpproxy. Simplified error handling by replacing custom logic with the standard library's errors.Is for clearer and more concise behavior.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in server shutdown process.
    • Updated error messaging for request handling failures.
  • Refactor

    • Removed destination address resolution logic in HTTP proxy handling.
    • Modified test cases to simulate more extreme invalid host scenarios.

Removed redundant destination resolution code from httpproxy. Simplified error handling by replacing custom logic with the standard library's `errors.Is` for clearer and more concise behavior.
Updated the test URL to simulate a more realistic failing case. Adjusted the expected error message to match the server's response for improved clarity and alignment with current behavior.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ryanbekhen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9b8ba6 and 2d699c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go (3 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to error handling and request processing in the nanoproxy project. In the main application file, the error checking logic for server closure has been updated to use errors.Is() for more robust error comparison. In the HTTP proxy implementation, the host resolution mechanism has been removed from the handleHTTP method, potentially simplifying the request routing process. The corresponding test cases have been adjusted to reflect these changes, updating the invalid host scenario and expected error message.

Changes

File Change Summary
nanoproxy.go Updated error handling to use errors.Is() for checking server closure
pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy.go Removed destination address resolution logic in handleHTTP method
pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go Modified test cases with updated invalid host and error message

Poem

🐰 A Proxy's Tale of Simplicity
Errors wrapped, no longer tight,
Resolving hosts? We'll skip that fight!
Streamlined code, a rabbit's delight,
Nanoproxy dances with pure might!
🚀✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go (1)

105-105: Simplify the invalid host test.

Using "invalidhostinvalidhostinvalidhost.com" is unnecessarily long. A shorter name like "invalid-host.local" would be clearer and serve the same purpose.

- req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "http://invalidhostinvalidhostinvalidhost.com", nil)
+ req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "http://invalid-host.local", nil)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ab6cca and 2e72156.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • nanoproxy.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy.go (0 hunks)
  • pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Test Coverage
pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go

[error] 101-101: Test failure: TestServer_ServeHTTP/Handle_HTTP_-_successful_authorization_but_Dial_fails - Expected status code 502 but got 200


[error] 298-298: Test failure: TestServer_HandleHTTP_ClientDoError/Failed_to_resolve_DNS - Error message mismatch: 'Bad gateway: failed to send request' does not contain expected 'Bad gateway: failed to resolve destination'

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
nanoproxy.go (1)

4-4: LGTM! Good improvement in error handling.

The switch to errors.Is() is a better practice for error comparison as it handles wrapped errors correctly.

Also applies to: 104-104

pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Updated test assertion to validate the revised error message for bad gateway scenarios. Ensures alignment with the updated error handling behavior.
Updated the test to use a more appropriate URL for the Dial failure case, ensuring better alignment with the test objective. This change improves test clarity and avoids ambiguity in test behavior.
@ryanbekhen ryanbekhen merged commit 1684121 into master Jan 23, 2025
5 checks passed
@ryanbekhen ryanbekhen deleted the fix-remove-unused-resolver branch January 23, 2025 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant