-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(httpproxy): remove unused resolver handling code #34
Conversation
Removed redundant destination resolution code from httpproxy. Simplified error handling by replacing custom logic with the standard library's `errors.Is` for clearer and more concise behavior.
Updated the test URL to simulate a more realistic failing case. Adjusted the expected error message to match the server's response for improved clarity and alignment with current behavior.
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ryanbekhen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to error handling and request processing in the nanoproxy project. In the main application file, the error checking logic for server closure has been updated to use Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go (1)
105-105
: Simplify the invalid host test.Using
"invalidhostinvalidhostinvalidhost.com"
is unnecessarily long. A shorter name like"invalid-host.local"
would be clearer and serve the same purpose.- req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "http://invalidhostinvalidhostinvalidhost.com", nil) + req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "http://invalid-host.local", nil)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
nanoproxy.go
(2 hunks)pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy.go
(0 hunks)pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Test Coverage
pkg/httpproxy/httpproxy_test.go
[error] 101-101: Test failure: TestServer_ServeHTTP/Handle_HTTP_-_successful_authorization_but_Dial_fails - Expected status code 502 but got 200
[error] 298-298: Test failure: TestServer_HandleHTTP_ClientDoError/Failed_to_resolve_DNS - Error message mismatch: 'Bad gateway: failed to send request' does not contain expected 'Bad gateway: failed to resolve destination'
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
nanoproxy.go (1)
4-4
: LGTM! Good improvement in error handling.The switch to
errors.Is()
is a better practice for error comparison as it handles wrapped errors correctly.Also applies to: 104-104
Updated test assertion to validate the revised error message for bad gateway scenarios. Ensures alignment with the updated error handling behavior.
Updated the test to use a more appropriate URL for the Dial failure case, ensuring better alignment with the test objective. This change improves test clarity and avoids ambiguity in test behavior.
Removed redundant destination resolution code from httpproxy. Simplified error handling by replacing custom logic with the standard library's
errors.Is
for clearer and more concise behavior.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor