-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
Release 3.0 #267
Comments
I tested on windows, seems to work so far. I'll post here if I encounter something with my Windows setup. |
@Ciantic thanks! I appreciate that. |
I just tried out v
Do you have any clue? Thanks! |
Just updated and it looks like Also I'm getting this error:
Also: Even after it crashes, the process is still open. In other words, I have to press cmd-c just to get the process to exit. |
It would be good to tackle this issue before 3.0: #129. |
|
beta.3 using typescript 2.1.1 just hangs after showing |
same problem as jefbarn but for TS 2.0.10 |
@vascofernandes do you have some example to reproduce? |
ATL 3.0.0-beta.3 is ignoring exclude configuration from webpack - using filter /.(spec|e2e).ts/ still compiles the spec files. You can test this with the angular2-webpack-starter by updating ATL to latest and removing the ForkCheckerPlugin reference... Reverting to 2.2.1 fixes the problem. |
@LennyThompson I think you should ignore those files from within |
Thanks for the response Bazyli, but does that mean the exclude
configuration is ignored by ATL? and you need to control this through the
tsconfig?
Cheers
Lenny
…On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Bazyli Brzóska ***@***.***> wrote:
@LennyThompson <https://github.com/LennyThompson> I think you should
ignore those files from within tsconfig.json. If you need, you can create
a second tsconfig.json for the production build that doesn't include
these spec files.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#267 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALkaHyNR0p5z4KVPoh5FRZoAvUlALd4Yks5rBXIngaJpZM4KoJT_>
.
|
Not sure what's the designed behavior for exclude configuration @LennyThompson, but ATL should follow the exclude list in tsconfig in any case. |
@LennyThompson @niieani we have two different conceptions here:
|
@s-panferov yeah, this is how I understood it. Good points to add to the README, though ;) |
Thanks guys, I'll go back to version 3 then.
…On 25 Nov 2016 19:37, "Bazyli Brzóska" ***@***.***> wrote:
@s-panferov <https://github.com/s-panferov> yeah, this is how I
understood it. Good points to add to the README, though ;)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#267 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALkaH9vbgip1S2AanI7B_L0geeI9j-pnks5rBqxigaJpZM4KoJT_>
.
|
@s-panferov When using the
Strangely if I use the Any idea what could cause or how I should debug this? |
Just wanted to let you know that 3.0 beta.9 is working again with my project. Thanks! |
Has anyone seen this issue before (with beta.9): This is in a very large project that uses 2 instances of ATL (and unfortunately I can't post the code). If no one has encountered an issue like this before I'll try to produce a minimal sample project that exhibits it. Also -- the error repeats it self around 500 times. More info: it doesn't always happen, sometimes it happens on first build, but mostly happens on rebuild during a watch. |
@pselden I've had that many times. It means lodash definitions are included more than once in your parsing. But I wouldn't say it has to do with v3 per se |
#267 (comment) -- thanks, I just never saw it before until I updated to 3.x beta. How would I go about fixing that then -- making sure there's only one lodash in my node_modules? One of the reasons I thought it might be an issue with v3 was that it only happens during a rebuild. |
Whenever it's happened to me, there was always a lot of trial and error. It used to happen a lot with my npm-linked modules, but new versions of TS have fixed that. Try with different options in |
Now with ATL .17 beta I'm seeing a lot of "unknown error"
And then the build fails -- while in previous versions it would succeed. This does not happen when running in watch mode. Any ideas where to look? Note: "tsc" works correctly. Another edit: I think it is similar to this other issue I see: #323 -- although I am using multiple instances of at-loader by using the 'instance' property (instead of multiple configs) |
ts-loader
ts-loader
, Joining forces with ts-loader? #266Blockers:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: