-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sage.crypto
: Update # needs
, modularization fixes
#36106
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c014992
Add # optional - numpy etc.
mkoeppe 94ea10e
Massive modularization fixes
mkoeppe 280acb2
sage.crypto: Modularization fixes for imports, # optional
mkoeppe f030dec
src/sage/crypto/lattice.py: Fix markup
mkoeppe 1a6738e
More # optional
mkoeppe 381f3f6
sage.crypto: Update # needs
mkoeppe 998958b
src/sage/crypto: Update file-level doctest tag
mkoeppe 614be8a
src/sage/crypto: sage -fixdoctests --only-tags
mkoeppe 6d39144
sage.crypto.block_cipher: Modularization fix
mkoeppe 9d5554c
sage.crypto: Update # needs, use more block tags, doctest cosmetics
mkoeppe d256d96
src/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx: Fix imports
mkoeppe 2d897bb
sage.crypto: More block tags, fixup
mkoeppe 2f0f2f6
src/sage/crypto/lattice.py: Docstring cosmetics
mkoeppe 826f72d
src/sage/crypto/classical_cipher.py: Use one more block-scoped tag
mkoeppe 37a6b46
sage -fixdoctests --long --fixed-point --only-tags src/sage/crypto
mkoeppe File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | ||
# sage.doctest: needs sage.combinat sage.modules sage.rings.finite_rings | ||
r""" | ||
Mini-AES | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | ||
# sage.doctest: needs sage.combinat sage.rings.finite_rings | ||
r""" | ||
Simplified DES | ||
|
||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are we sure that this change is safe for users ? I'm not sure it's currently tested...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this just distinguishes scalar input from list/vector input. In fact, when neither of the two conditions holds,
inputType
remains uninitialized, leading to an error in the last line of the function