Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sage.sat: Update # needs #36658

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

@mkoeppe mkoeppe commented Nov 5, 2023

Cherry-picked from #35095.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

Copy link
Contributor

@dcoudert dcoudert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

otherwise LGTM.

sage: H[-1] # optional - pycryptosat
sage: set_random_seed(2300)
sage: sr = mq.SR(1, 2, 2, 4, gf2=True, polybori=True) # optional - pycryptosat, needs sage.modules sage.rings.finite_rings
sage: F,s = sr.polynomial_system() # optional - pycryptosat # needs sage.modules sage.rings.finite_rings
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could be better to use block scope in view of the number of tags

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in d1c6642, actually using file-level

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit d1c6642; changes) is ready! 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@dcoudert dcoudert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Nov 6, 2023

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants