-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add simple methods to convert to and from bytes for ZZ
and finite fields
#37343
Conversation
I decided to implement the below, so this comment is redundant An extension of this PR would be to do the same for finite fields, where the length of the bytes is set by the characteristic automatically... Not sure this needs to be done in the same PR though as i imagine people may have opinions about this |
Linting fails |
Looks good to me |
ZZ
and finite fields
Added the review label back in because I added more features to the PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small changes.
src/sage/rings/integer.pyx
Outdated
TODO: should we convert straight from the gmp type in cython? This is definitely | ||
possible but I'm not sure the cleanest way to do this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can have a look at that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, wanna look before merging the PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
Committed changes. Thanks for your review. |
Looks good to me, but changed to If I don't finish in a day or two then better merge it first. |
Note that one-line descriptions should be one line (=sentence). So the part about the internal bit should go on its own paragraph. Also please use |
Thanks Travis. I made changes from your feedback. Since it was five days since Gareth suggested working on the optimisation for conversion to GMP I may remove the needs work if that's OK? I dont think it's an important optimisation for the method. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Yes, I think you can remove the needs work. (Either way, that isn't anything that requires this to be held up as it can always be done on a subsequent PR.)
I think the OUTPUT:
blocks are gratuitous, but if you want to keep them, either no capital letter for the bullet point or remove the bullet and make it a full sentence with a period/full-stop.
Just as a comment: I also dislike the blanklines between input blocks as I find it more complicated to parse quickly. However, this is up to individual authors, but I feel compelled to mention it from time to time.
Hi sorry, I’m three days behind on all GitHub discussions 🥲 very sorry for the lack of update. I’ll do it on a separate PR |
I removed the needs work tab and commited the suggested changes. I added the "needs review" back in simply as I didnt want to label my own PR as "positive review". Will let the CI run and I suppose someone else can add the final label when they have time to double check the latest commit. |
""" | ||
Return an array of bytes representing an integer. | ||
|
||
Internally relies on the python ``int.to_bytes()`` method. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a syntax to link Python methods, similar to :meth:`asdf`? Maybe more advanced devs like @tscrim will know
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure. It might work as other :meth:`class_name.method_name`
things, but that is more of a sphinx thing than anything sage-specific...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise it looks good to me, provided CI pass (missing the three ubuntu Conda ones)
… `ZZ` and finite fields I often have to work with the conversion of bytes / integers and currently do this by working with `int` types and then casting things to `ZZ` or elements of finite fields. This PR is a small addition to `Integer` and `FiniteField` types which allow this with simply functions which internally convert to / from `int` for the user so that things can be done naively from SageMath types. There's a TODO in the code which acknowledges that a faster method for `to_bytes` might be to work straight from the `gmp` object in cython for the integers, but it wasn't obvious to me how to do this. ### Examples ```py sage: ZZ.from_bytes(b'\x00\x10', byteorder='big') 16 sage: ZZ.from_bytes(b'\x00\x10', byteorder='little') 4096 sage: ZZ.from_bytes(b'\xfc\x00', byteorder='big', is_signed=True) -1024 sage: ZZ.from_bytes(b'\xfc\x00', byteorder='big', is_signed=False) 64512 sage: ZZ.from_bytes([255, 0, 0], byteorder='big') 16711680 sage: type(_) <class 'sage.rings.integer.Integer'> ``` ```py sage: (1024).to_bytes(2, byteorder='big') b'\x04\x00' sage: (1024).to_bytes(10, byteorder='big') b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x04\x00' sage: (-1024).to_bytes(10, byteorder='big', is_signed=True) b'\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xfc\x00' sage: x = 1000 sage: x.to_bytes((x.bit_length() + 7) // 8, byteorder='little') b'\xe8\x03' ``` ```py sage: F = GF(65537) sage: a = F.random_element() sage: a.to_bytes() b'\x00\n\x86' sage: F.from_bytes(_) 2694 sage: a 2694 ``` ```py sage: F = GF(3^10) sage: a = F.random_element(); a z10^8 + z10^7 + 2*z10^5 + 2*z10^4 + 2*z10^3 + z10^2 + z10 + 1 sage: a.to_bytes() b'$\xf7' sage: F.from_bytes(_) z10^8 + z10^7 + 2*z10^5 + 2*z10^4 + 2*z10^3 + z10^2 + z10 + 1 ``` ### 📝 Checklist - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly. URL: sagemath#37343 Reported by: Giacomo Pope Reviewer(s): Giacomo Pope, grhkm21, Travis Scrimshaw
Co-authored-by: Travis Scrimshaw <clfrngrown@aol.com>
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit e51474d; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
I often have to work with the conversion of bytes / integers and currently do this by working with
int
types and then casting things toZZ
or elements of finite fields.This PR is a small addition to
Integer
andFiniteField
types which allow this with simply functions which internally convert to / fromint
for the user so that things can be done naively from SageMath types.There's a TODO in the code which acknowledges that a faster method for
to_bytes
might be to work straight from thegmp
object in cython for the integers, but it wasn't obvious to me how to do this.Examples
📝 Checklist