Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sage.schemes.generic: fix docs #37346

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

grhkm21
Copy link
Contributor

@grhkm21 grhkm21 commented Feb 14, 2024

Fix various docs problems.

I also removed the SchemeRationalPoint class entirely since it is not used anywhere in the entire Sage library. If anyone oppose this please notify me!

@kwankyu
Copy link
Collaborator

kwankyu commented Feb 15, 2024

I also removed the SchemeRationalPoint class entirely since it is not used anywhere in the entire Sage library. If anyone oppose this please notify me!

I agree. sage.schemes.generic.morphism.SchemeMorphism_point would suffice for points as morphism.

@kwankyu
Copy link
Collaborator

kwankyu commented Feb 15, 2024

Otherwise lgtm.

@grhkm21
Copy link
Contributor Author

grhkm21 commented Feb 15, 2024

Thanks! I also find a lot of violation for the two edits you suggested, I'll make another PR just for them.

@grhkm21
Copy link
Contributor Author

grhkm21 commented Feb 26, 2024

Sorry, the doctests are written wrong I think... let me take a look

@grhkm21
Copy link
Contributor Author

grhkm21 commented Feb 26, 2024

@kwankyu Do you mind re-reviewing and accepting? It's a one line change :) Thanks!

@kwankyu
Copy link
Collaborator

kwankyu commented Feb 26, 2024

Thanks. Tests pass on my system.

Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 4d248d9; changes) is ready! 🎉

@vbraun vbraun merged commit b0343d1 into sagemath:develop Mar 25, 2024
15 checks passed
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.4 milestone Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants